The DDCA is responding to allegations of irregularities linked to the Delhi Premier League. They clarify that these claims remain unverified and seek official examination.
DPL Spot-Fixing Row Erupts After Sting Operation, DDCA Seeks BCCI Intervention
DDCA has responded to alleged DPL fixing claims after a sting operation, saying the allegations remain unverified and seeking examination by authorities.

- DDCA addresses Delhi Premier League fixing claims, calls them unverified.
- Controversy stemmed from ex-player's alleged bookmaker connections.
- Vansh Bedi separately reported a corrupt match-fixing approach.
- DDCA seeks BCCI direction, pledging full inquiry cooperation.
A Tehelka sting operation has triggered scrutiny around the Delhi Premier League after former Ranji cricketer Rachit Bhatia made a series of claims about access to playing XIs, betting-related information and alleged spot-fixing. The claims have not been independently established, while the DDCA has said the allegations reported in the media are unverified.
The controversy has since widened after social media users linked former Chennai Super Kings player Vansh Bedi to the unnamed CSK-linked player mentioned during the sting. Bedi has denied being the player referred to by Bhatia and said his legal team is taking civil and criminal action against those spreading what he described as false and defamatory claims.
Tehelka Sting Raises Questions Over DPL
Tehelka reported that Bhatia claimed he could obtain Central Delhi Kings' playing XI through a player associated with the team and provide the information to its undercover reporter, who was posing as a bookmaker, before the official announcement.
The investigation said Bhatia supplied a proposed Central Delhi Kings XI ahead of their August 3, 2026 match against North Delhi Strikers. Tehelka reported that the names subsequently matched the XI announced for the game.
The publication also reported conversations in which Bhatia discussed payments for team information and possible spot-fixing arrangements involving future DPL matches. These details form part of Tehelka's undercover investigation and are claims attributed to Bhatia, rather than findings independently established by a cricketing authority.
The sting also included Bhatia's claims concerning the 2025 IPL season. According to Tehelka's report, he claimed to have passed information relating to Chennai Super Kings matches to London-based bookmakers through Snapchat and alleged that he had fixed five IPL matches.
Those statements were made by Bhatia during the undercover operation. They do not, by themselves, establish that CSK, a particular CSK player or any specific IPL match was involved in fixing.
Tehelka also reported Bhatia's claim that he had previously participated in spot-fixing during the 2018-19 Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy, including allegations involving two deliberate wides and payments.
The claims relating to the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy, like the other allegations in the sting, remain allegations attributed to Bhatia and have not been presented by the DDCA as established findings.
Why Vansh Bedi's Name Surfaced
Bedi's name entered the wider discussion because he had been associated with Chennai Super Kings in IPL 2025 and subsequently played for Central Delhi Kings in the 2026 DPL.
However, being the common link between the two teams does not establish that Bedi was the player referred to by Bhatia or that he participated in any wrongdoing.
Following the spread of the sting-related claims on social media, Bedi issued a statement denying the connection. He said he was not the individual referred to by Bhatia and denied any involvement in match-fixing.
“I categorically state that I am not the individual referred to by Ex-Ranji Trophy cricketer Rachit Bhatia in the Tehelka sting operation concerning alleged match-fixing involving a CSK player, nor do I have any involvement whatsoever in any such activity,” Bedi said in his statement.
Bedi also objected to what he described as false and defamatory content circulating about him online. He said his legal team was taking “appropriate civil and criminal action” against those responsible and asked people not to create or share such content.
ALSO READ | Ex-CSK Star Threatens Legal Action After Sting Operation Sparks Spot-Fixing Claims
Bedi Reported A Separate Corrupt Approach
There is also a separate development that is important to the context.
The Times of India reported on September 22 that Bedi himself had reported an alleged corrupt approach to the DDCA's Anti-Corruption Wing during the DPL. According to DDCA Secretary Ashok Sharma, the approach allegedly came from a player from Uttar Pradesh who was also participating in a T20 league in the state.
“Vansh Bedi promptly reported a corrupt approach to the Anti-Corruption wing from a player from Uttar Pradesh,” Sharma was quoted as saying.
The DDCA said the approach had been documented and that anti-corruption officers had been assigned to the DPL teams during the tournament.
The development is separate from the social-media claims linking Bedi to Bhatia's sting. Reporting that Bedi was approached and that he reported the approach should not be conflated with an allegation that Bedi himself was involved in fixing.
DDCA Seeks BCCI Guidance
The DDCA has now formally responded to reports concerning alleged irregularities involving players and a franchise associated with the DPL.
In its response, the association said the allegations were unverified and that it had shared information with the relevant authorities for examination through established processes. The DDCA also said it would cooperate with any inquiry and that action, if warranted, would be based on the findings of competent authorities and the applicable rules.
DDCA Secretary Ashok Sharma separately confirmed to Hindustan Times and The Times of India that the association had written to the BCCI seeking guidance on how to proceed with the matter.
Sharma told Hindustan Times that the DDCA could provide available material, including video footage, if requested. He also said that verification of telephone recordings would require involvement from law-enforcement authorities.
The DDCA has pointed to its anti-corruption arrangements during the DPL, saying specialist Security Liaison Officers were deployed with all eight teams and that the association had put dedicated anti-corruption measures in place for the tournament.
What Happens Next
The matter now involves several separate developments that should be distinguished from one another.
Tehelka's investigation contains claims made by Bhatia about alleged access to team information, betting-related activity and fixing. Bedi's name subsequently became the subject of social-media speculation because of his links to CSK and Central Delhi Kings, but Bedi has denied being the player referred to and threatened legal action over what he called defamatory claims.
Separately, Bedi is reported to have notified the DDCA Anti-Corruption Wing after an alleged corrupt approach during the DPL. The DDCA has documented that matter and has sought guidance from the BCCI.
At this stage, the DDCA has described the wider allegations as unverified. Therefore, the claims made during the sting should not be presented as proof that any particular player, franchise or match was involved in fixing unless such findings are established through an official investigation or other independently verified evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Delhi & District Cricket Association (DDCA) responding to?
How did the allegations about the Delhi Premier League surface?
The allegations surfaced following a sting operation featuring former Ranji Trophy player Rachit Bhatia. He claimed he passed information to bookmakers during his playing days.
Is former CSK player Vansh Bedi implicated in the DPL controversy?
Vansh Bedi was brought into focus, but no allegations against him have been established. He separately reported a corrupt approach to the DDCA's Anti-Corruption wing.
What is the DDCA's position on the unverified allegations?
The DDCA stresses that the claims remain unverified and should not be treated as established facts. They will cooperate fully with any inquiry and await findings from competent authorities.





















