Breaking: Debate Intensifies Over Waqf Amendment Bill, Opposition Questions Constitutional Validity and Intent

The debate over the Waqf Amendment Bill has intensified as it awaits the President’s approval after passing both houses of Parliament. The opposition, led by the Samajwadi Party (SP), has raised concerns about the bill’s constitutional validity and its potential impact on Muslim welfare. Dharmendra Yadav, a spokesperson for the Samajwadi Party, expressed concerns about the constitutional principles underlying the bill. He accused the ruling BJP of undermining these principles, especially pointing to Article 13, Section 3, which he claims has been violated. He argued that the bill seeks to allow the government to confiscate Waqf land through legal means, undermining the rights of individuals. Yadav also questioned why non-Muslims are being included in Waqf committees, with provisions allowing for "at least two non-Muslims" to be part of the committees. This, he believes, sets a double standard, as no similar rule exists for other religious institutions. The government, however, has defended the bill, stating that it is a necessary amendment to update an outdated law, which has passed through constitutional channels. They argue that the bill ensures better governance and accountability in Waqf properties, without undermining any community. The debate continues, with both sides strongly asserting their positions.