AI To The Rescue? Man Claims ChatGPT Helped Him Win Rs 2 Lakh Refund. Here's What Went Down
While the story highlights a potential new use case for generative AI — acting as a pseudo-paralegal for consumers — the lack of independent verification leaves room for doubt.
A Reddit post is stirring debate online after a user claimed that OpenAI’s ChatGPT helped him recover over $2,500 (more than Rs 2 lakh) from a non-refundable travel booking — a feat that many are calling impressive, while others demand proof.
In the now-viral post titled "Never take no for an answer," the Redditor detailed how he had planned a trip to Medellin, Colombia, through Expedia, bundling his flight and hotel bookings. However, due to a medical issue — Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) — he had to cancel at the last minute. The catch? He didn’t purchase travel insurance, and both the airline and hotel bookings were marked non-refundable.
Posts from the chatgpt
community on Reddit
When policy said no, AI said try again
Facing the possibility of losing a substantial sum, the user turned to ChatGPT-4o for help. With details of his condition and a doctor’s note in hand, he asked the AI tool to draft a compelling letter explaining his situation to both Expedia and the hotel.
Initially, the responses were predictable. Expedia cited its standard no-refund policy, and the hotel followed suit. But the AI-generated appeal seemingly shifted things. "The hotel granted me my refund due to a medical condition," the user wrote.
The airline proved more resistant. According to the Redditor, the airline only issued refunds for terminal illnesses or death. Once again, he asked ChatGPT to respond — this time emphasizing the impact of mental health issues on travel. “Within an hour, the airline allegedly agreed to issue a refund as well,” he claimed.
Reflecting on the experience, the user noted, “Had I not used ChatGPT, I would have had to hire a paralegal... It saved me from losing $2,500.”
Applause, scepticism, and ethical debates
The post quickly gained traction, with many users praising the creative use of AI to negotiate rigid corporate rules. “This is actually genius,” one user commented. “Using AI as your personal advocate is the future.”
However, others weren’t entirely convinced. Some questioned the timeline and requested proof, asking for screenshots to back up the claims. “Impressive if true – but screenshots would make it more believable,” a user replied.
The ethical dimension also sparked discussion. Several Redditors debated whether citing a mental health condition — even truthfully — to override a strict refund policy was appropriate. One user remarked, “Redact the personal info and post screenshots of the emails. We're all curious to learn ourselves, and verify the authenticity of the post.”
Another added, “I think the commenters are missing the takeaway on this post. It's a good reminder that ChatGPT can be such a strong advocate for people who may not have the ability, knowledge, or assertiveness to stand up for themselves. Although I agree, in this situation, lying was unethical and OP took advantage.”
AI as a legal aide? Future or fantasy?
While the story highlights a potential new use case for generative AI — acting as a pseudo-paralegal for consumers navigating complex policies — the lack of independent verification leaves room for doubt. Yet, it has certainly reignited conversations around how far AI can (or should) go in representing individuals in bureaucratic battles.
Whether or not the Redditor’s claims hold up, one thing is clear: ChatGPT’s role in shaping real-world outcomes is only just beginning.
Top Headlines
