The Allahabad High Court stayed the probe order, terming it 'prima facie illegal'. The court questioned the National Human Rights Commission's (NHRC) role in directing such an investigation.
Explorer
‘Silent On Mob Lynching’: Allahabad HC Raps Rights Panel, Stays EOW Probe Into UP Madrasas
The court also made strong remarks against the National Human Rights Commission, questioning its role in ordering such a probe and suggesting it should focus on its core duties.
The Allahabad High Court has stayed an order directing the Economic Offences Wing to investigate 588 aided madrasas in Uttar Pradesh, calling the move “prima facie illegal”.
Source : PTI
- High Court halts EOW probe into 588 aided madrasas.
- Court calls NHRC directive for probe 'prima facie illegal'.
- Bench criticizes NHRC for investigating madrasas, not mob lynching.
- Next hearing on the matter scheduled for May 11.
The Allahabad High Court has stayed an order directing the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) to probe 588 aided madrasas in Uttar Pradesh, terming the move “prima facie illegal” and issuing sharp remarks against the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).
The observation came during a hearing on the state government’s decision to entrust the EOW with an investigation into the madrasas, following directions from the NHRC.
Court Questions NHRC’s Intervention
During proceedings, the High Court criticised the human rights body, questioning its role in ordering such an inquiry. The bench remarked that the NHRC should focus on its primary responsibilities rather than directing investigative actions.
In a pointed observation, the court said that the commission remains silent in instances of mob lynching involving Muslims but is now ordering an investigation into madrasas.
ALSO READ | Supreme Court Declines Issuing New Guidelines On Hate Speech: 'Existing Laws Are Adequate'
EOW Probe Put on Hold
Taking note of the arguments, the court stayed the operation of the order assigning the probe to the EOW, offering immediate relief in the matter.
The bench indicated that, at first glance, the directive for such an investigation did not appear legally sustainable.
ALSO READ | PM Modi Prays At Kashi Vishwanath, Holds Trishul-Damru; 14-km Varanasi Roadshow Draws Crowds
Next Hearing on May 11
The case will now be taken up again on May 11, when the court is expected to hear further arguments on the legality of the NHRC’s directive and the state’s decision to act on it.
Before You Go
Patna Firing Case: Police Detain Two Guards Linked to Khan Sir’s Coaching Centre After Viral Video
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did the Allahabad High Court stay the probe into Uttar Pradesh madrasas?
What was the NHRC's involvement in the madrasa probe?
The NHRC directed the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) to investigate 588 aided madrasas in Uttar Pradesh. The High Court criticized the NHRC's intervention, questioning its mandate.
What was the High Court's opinion on the NHRC's actions?
The court sharply criticized the NHRC, suggesting it should focus on its primary responsibilities instead of directing investigations. They questioned the NHRC's silence on mob lynching cases involving Muslims.
When is the next hearing for this case?
The case is scheduled for its next hearing on May 11. The court will continue to hear arguments on the legality of the NHRC's directive and the state's decision.
Advertisement
Top Headlines
Cities
Crane Collapse At Jewar Airport Flyover Site Traps Workers Amid Rain
Cities
Delhi Hotel Fire: Court Grants Lovkesh Bajaj's 4-Day Police Custody
Cities
Delhi Hotel Fire: African Couple Found Dead In Each Other’s Arms
Cities
Dalai Lama To Undergo Left Knee Treatment In New Delhi This Month
Advertisement
Advertisement
