Explorer
Advertisement
Sabarimala Verdict: Devotees want to follow the tradition
The Supreme Court on Thursday referred the issue of entry of women into Sabarimala temple and other religious places to a larger seven-judge bench.
The Supreme Court in a 3:2 verdict referred the Sabarimala issue to a larger bench.
Justices R.F. Nariman and D.Y. Chandrachud dissented while Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Indu Malhotra and A.M. Khanwilkar were in favour of referring the matter to a larger bench.
However, there is no stay on the September 28, 2018 judgement which lifted the ban on the entry of women aged between 10 and 50 in the temple.
The Supreme Court in a 3:2 verdict referred the Sabarimala issue to a larger bench.
Justices R.F. Nariman and D.Y. Chandrachud dissented while Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Indu Malhotra and A.M. Khanwilkar were in favour of referring the matter to a larger bench.
However, there is no stay on the September 28, 2018 judgement which lifted the ban on the entry of women aged between 10 and 50 in the temple.
India
Election Celebration Turns into Near-Tragedy as MLA Shivaji Patil Escapes Safe in Shocking Incident
Jharkhand Election Results: Where BJP Missed the Mark and How Hemant Soren Turned the Tide?
Maharashtra Election Results 2024: How Many Seats Did MVA Party Win? | ABP News
Controversial Article in 'Saamana' Questions Maharashtra Election Results, Sparks Political Stir
All-Party Meeting Held Ahead of Parliament's Winter Session | ABP News
View More
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Top Headlines
India
Cities
Election 2024
IPL
Advertisement
Trending News
Sagarneel SinhaSagarneel Sinha
Opinion