The disagreement was over the suspension of ASI Sandeep Kumar, with the Minister ordering an immediate suspension and the SP citing jurisdictional limitations.
Heated Exchange Between Minister & Police SP Over Suspension In Land Dispute Case | Video Viral
The controversy relates to ASI Sandeep Kumar, posted with the Karnal Police, who has been accused of fraud in a land dispute.

- Minister Anil Vij and SP Upasana clashed over suspending ASI Sandeep Kumar.
- ASI Sandeep is accused of fraud in a land deal, taking ₹7 lakh.
- SP cited jurisdictional limits, unable to suspend officer from another district.
A sharp exchange took place between Haryana Minister Anil Vij and Kaithal Superintendent of Police Upasana during a committee meeting in Kaithal. The disagreement centred on the suspension of a police officer, with both sides differing over jurisdiction and authority.
The matter was later resolved after Deputy Commissioner Aparajita intervened.
Allegations Against ASI Sandeep Kumar
The controversy relates to ASI Sandeep Kumar, posted with the Karnal Police, who has been accused of fraud in a land dispute.
According to details discussed at the meeting, ASI Sandeep allegedly took an advance of ₹7 lakh from a buyer for the sale of land. When the land documents were found to be incorrect, the buyer cancelled the deal and sought a refund. Sandeep allegedly refused to return the money, following which a case was registered at the Titram police station in Kaithal.
During the investigation, it was found that Sandeep allegedly used his influence to slow the probe and have the case transferred to the Economic Cell in Karnal.
Dispute Over Suspension Powers
Minister Anil Vij objected to the developments and directed SP Upasana to immediately suspend the officer. The SP responded that since the policeman was posted in another district, Karnal, she did not have the authority to suspend him. She said she could only report the matter to the Deputy Inspector General (DIG).
At this point, the minister reacted strongly, saying, “I can suspend anyone in all of Haryana. Suspend him on my orders.”
Haryana: Cabinet Minister Anil Vij and Kaithal SP Upasana had a heated exchange during a grievance committee meeting over a land fraud case involving a police employee. Vij ordered suspension and asked that the DGP be informed pic.twitter.com/NxTjR9zD7r
— IANS (@ians_india) February 13, 2026
The SP reiterated that under the rules she could not directly suspend a constable from another district and could only recommend action to a higher authority.
Matter Resolved After Clarification
The situation eased after further clarification. The minister later said, “That's what I'm saying: write a letter to the DIG, citing my order.”
Officials indicated that the episode stemmed from a misunderstanding regarding procedural rules. Under established norms, an SP cannot directly suspend a constable posted in another district and can only forward a recommendation to the competent authority. Anil Vij subsequently accepted this explanation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the main point of contention between Minister Anil Vij and SP Upasana?
What allegations are made against ASI Sandeep Kumar?
ASI Sandeep Kumar is accused of fraud in a land dispute, allegedly taking ₹7 lakh from a buyer and refusing to refund it after the deal was cancelled due to incorrect documents.
Why did SP Upasana state she could not suspend ASI Sandeep Kumar immediately?
The SP explained that ASI Sandeep Kumar was posted in a different district (Karnal) and she lacked the authority to suspend an officer from another jurisdiction directly.
How was the dispute between the Minister and the SP resolved?
The situation was resolved after further clarification on procedural rules. The Minister accepted the SP's explanation and instructed her to write a letter to the DIG citing his order for the suspension.

























