ICC Bans This Cricketer For Four Years Under ICC Anti-Corruption Code

ICC also said that the cricketer did not inform ACU complete details of invitations or approaches or to engage in corrupt conduct in relation to the series in April 2019 against Zimbabwe.

ICC

New Delhi: The International Cricket Council (ICC) decided to ban United Arab Emirates (UAE) wicket-keeper batsman Gulam Shabbir for four years from all cricket after he admitted breaching six counts of the ICC Anti-Corruption Code. As per news agency ANI, according to ICC, Gulam admitted to being in breach of the following provisions under the Code:

Breach of Article 2.4.4 - failing to disclose to the ACU full details of attempted approaches to engage in corrupt conduct in relation to the series against Nepal in January/February 2019.

ICC also said that the cricketer did not inform Anti-Corruption Unit (ACU) complete details of invitations or approaches or to engage in corrupt conduct in relation to the series in April 2019 against Zimbabwe hence breaching Article 2.4.4.

He breached three more provisions under the Code: Breach of Article 2.4.5 - failing to disclose to the ACU full details of facts and/or incidents that he was aware of which may have evidenced corrupt conduct by other Participants.

Breach of Article 2.4.6 - failing to cooperate with the ACU's investigation by failing to surrender all his mobile devices upon request and failing to produce documentation requested by the ACU.

Breach of Article 2.4.7 - obstructing the ACU's investigation by concealing information that may have been relevant to the investigation.

ICC said as a result of the admissions, he has accepted a sanction of a four-year period of ineligibility which ends at midnight on August 20, 2025.

Alex Marshall, ICC General Manager - Integrity Unit, said: "Shabbir played 40 matches for the UAE and was expected to understand his responsibilities as an international cricketer. He also attended at least three anti-corruption education sessions in which players were reminded of their obligations to report any approaches by corrupters.

"It was disappointing to note that he did not report any of the approaches. Although he was cooperative when interviewed and expressed remorse, it is only appropriate that he be banned so that a strong message goes out to other players and potential corrupters," he added.