Mamata Banerjee led a protest march from Jadavpur to Hazra against the Enforcement Directorate's search of the I-PAC office.
Suvendu Adhikari Sends Defamation Notice To Mamata Over Coal Scam Remarks
In a strongly worded speech, the Chief Minister said in a threatening tone, “You are lucky that I am still in the chair, so I do not take those pen drives out.”

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee led a protest march from Jadavpur to Hazra on Friday against the Enforcement Directorate’s search of the I-PAC office. Addressing a gathering at Hazra after the march, Banerjee launched a sharp attack on the BJP, targeting Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari over the alleged coal scam.
In a strongly worded speech, the Chief Minister said in a threatening tone, “You are lucky that I am still in the chair, so I do not take those pen drives out.”
Sharp Attack On Amit Shah, Suvendu Adhikari
During her address, Banerjee publicly alleged the involvement of Amit Shah and Suvendu Adhikari in the coal scam and claimed she possessed evidence to substantiate the allegations. The remarks were made amid heightened political tension following the ED’s action against I-PAC.
Suvendu Sends Defamation Notice
Later the same night, ANI sources reported that Suvendu Adhikari escalated the confrontation by sending a legal notice to Mamata Banerjee for defamation. Through his lawyer, Adhikari issued a 72-hour notice demanding a response from the Chief Minister.
West Bengal LoP Suvendu Adhikari has sent a defamation notice to West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, demanding that she produce all alleged evidence within 72 hours.
— ANI (@ANI) January 9, 2026
"It has come to the knowledge of my client that on 08.01.2026 and again on 09.01.2026, you have made… pic.twitter.com/b4XtyRQnuQ
The notice states that on January 8 and January 9, 2026, Mamata Banerjee made “reckless, baseless and unsubstantiated allegations” against Adhikari by publicly linking him and the Union Home Minister to the coal scam.
Demand For Evidence Within 72 Hours
In the legal notice, Adhikari has demanded that all documents, information and evidence cited by the Chief Minister be handed over to him within 72 hours. The notice warns that failure to do so will result in civil and criminal defamation proceedings.
Adhikari has alleged that the Chief Minister and her family are attempting to divert public attention from “serious issues” involving family members and the ruling party. He described the allegations as part of a “planned and sinister plan”.
LoP Says Remarks Meant To Divert Attention
In a post, the Leader of the Opposition wrote, “Today, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, to divert attention from the ED investigation, made completely baseless defamatory allegations against me. She linked the names of the Honorable Union Home Minister and me with the ‘alleged’ coal scam.”
He further said the statements were made publicly without evidence and amounted to personal insult. “Such unsubstantiated claims have not only tarnished my reputation but have also tarnished the dignity of public discourse,” Adhikari wrote.
Reiterating his stand, he said that if documentary evidence is not produced within the stipulated time, he will proceed with defamation cases under appropriate civil and criminal provisions.
Related Video
Breaking News: Uri Forests Engulfed in Flames, Baramulla Fire Causes Massive Damage
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Mamata Banerjee lead a protest march?
What allegations did Mamata Banerjee make against Amit Shah and Suvendu Adhikari?
Mamata Banerjee publicly alleged the involvement of Amit Shah and Suvendu Adhikari in the coal scam, claiming she possessed evidence.
What action did Suvendu Adhikari take in response to Mamata Banerjee's allegations?
Suvendu Adhikari sent a legal notice to Mamata Banerjee for defamation, demanding a response and evidence within 72 hours.
What is Suvendu Adhikari's reasoning for calling the allegations baseless?
Adhikari stated that Banerjee made reckless, baseless, and unsubstantiated allegations to divert attention from other issues, tarnishing his reputation and public discourse.

























