Explorer

'No Fundamental Rights Violation': SC Rejects Plea To Add Savarkar's Name To 1950 Act

Supreme Court rejected a petition seeking to add Vinayak Damodar Savarkar's name to the 1950 Act. The court, led by Chief Justice Gavai, found no violation of the petitioner's fundamental rights

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a plea which sought a direction to the Centre to include the name of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in the schedule to the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950.

The 1950 law is an Act to prevent improper use of certain emblems and names for professional and commercial purposes.

A bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih observed there was no violation of fundamental rights of the petitioner.

The petitioner, who was appearing in person, told the bench that he has been researching on Savarkar for the last 30 years and he needed an opportunity to establish certain facts about Savarkar in a legally verifiable manner.

"I also want to request the court to issue directions to respondent number two (Union of India) and respondent number three (Ministry of Home Affairs) to include his name in the schedule to the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950," the petitioner said.

The CJI asked, "What is the violation of your fundamental right?".

The petitioner referred to Article 51A of the Constitution which deals with fundamental duties.

He said Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi "cannot impede my fundamental duties".

The CJI said an Article 32 petition can be entertained only if there was violation of fundamental rights.

"If you want anything to be published in the curriculum, make a representation to the Union of India," the bench said.

The petitioner said he has already made representation to the government.

The bench dismissed the plea.

In a separate matter, the apex court had on April 25 pulled up Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for his "irresponsible" remarks on Savarkar at a rally in Maharashtra.

The top court, however, had stayed the criminal proceedings against Rahul Gandhi in a case lodged in Uttar Pradesh for his remarks. 

(This report has been published as part of the auto-generated syndicate wire feed. Apart from the headline, no editing has been done in the copy by ABP Live.)

Read more
Sponsored Links by Taboola
Advertisement

Top Headlines

Congress Leader Shares AI-Generated Video Showing PM Modi As ‘Chaiwala’, Sparks Row
Congress Leader Shares AI-Generated Video Showing PM Modi As ‘Chaiwala’, Sparks Row
Rupee Breaks 90 Mark Against US Dollar: Why The Currency Is Struggling Today
Rupee Breaks 90 Mark Against US Dollar: Why The Currency Is Struggling Today
Russia Ratifies Key Military Logistics Pact With India Ahead Of Putin’s Visit
Russia Ratifies Key Military Logistics Pact With India Ahead Of Putin’s Visit
We Combed Through Govt's Mandatory 'Sanchar Saathi' App. Here's Which Permissions It WILL Ask You
We Combed Through Govt's Sanchar Saathi App. Here's Which Permission It WILL Ask You
Advertisement

Videos

Update: Renuka Chowdhury hits back after dog-entry row; Opposition protests intensify
Breaking: Rajnath Singh reignites debate with claim on Nehru’s stance in Babri dispute
Winter Parliamentary Session: Renuka Chaudhary's
Rajnath Singh Revives Nehru–Patel Debate With Claim Linking Babri Dispute to Public Funds
Breaking: Maulana Mahmood Madani Sparks New Row With Call to Teach ‘Jihad’ in Schools
Advertisement

Photo Gallery

25°C
New Delhi
Rain: 100mm
Humidity: 97%
Wind: WNW 47km/h
See Today's Weather
powered by
Accu Weather
Advertisement
Embed widget