Explorer

'No Fundamental Rights Violation': SC Rejects Plea To Add Savarkar's Name To 1950 Act

Supreme Court rejected a petition seeking to add Vinayak Damodar Savarkar's name to the 1950 Act. The court, led by Chief Justice Gavai, found no violation of the petitioner's fundamental rights

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a plea which sought a direction to the Centre to include the name of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in the schedule to the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950.

The 1950 law is an Act to prevent improper use of certain emblems and names for professional and commercial purposes.

A bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih observed there was no violation of fundamental rights of the petitioner.

The petitioner, who was appearing in person, told the bench that he has been researching on Savarkar for the last 30 years and he needed an opportunity to establish certain facts about Savarkar in a legally verifiable manner.

"I also want to request the court to issue directions to respondent number two (Union of India) and respondent number three (Ministry of Home Affairs) to include his name in the schedule to the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950," the petitioner said.

The CJI asked, "What is the violation of your fundamental right?".

The petitioner referred to Article 51A of the Constitution which deals with fundamental duties.

He said Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi "cannot impede my fundamental duties".

The CJI said an Article 32 petition can be entertained only if there was violation of fundamental rights.

"If you want anything to be published in the curriculum, make a representation to the Union of India," the bench said.

The petitioner said he has already made representation to the government.

The bench dismissed the plea.

In a separate matter, the apex court had on April 25 pulled up Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for his "irresponsible" remarks on Savarkar at a rally in Maharashtra.

The top court, however, had stayed the criminal proceedings against Rahul Gandhi in a case lodged in Uttar Pradesh for his remarks. 

(This report has been published as part of the auto-generated syndicate wire feed. Apart from the headline, no editing has been done in the copy by ABP Live.)

Top Headlines

Tamil Nadu Assembly Takes Fresh Swipe At Delimitation, Demands 33% Women's Quota From 2029
Tamil Nadu Assembly Takes Fresh Swipe At Delimitation, Demands 33% Women's Quota From 2029
Naga Village Attacked In Manipur's Kangpokpi, 9 Houses Burnt Down
Naga Village Attacked In Manipur's Kangpokpi, 9 Houses Burnt Down
Fresh India-China Tension As Troops Face Off At LAC Near Arunachal Pradesh After 6 Years
Fresh India-China Tension As Troops Face Off At LAC Near Arunachal Pradesh After 6 Years
UP Govt Begins Cow Urine Buyback Project; Farmers To Get Rs 10/Litre, Samajwadi Party Takes Jibe
UP Govt Begins Cow Urine Buyback Project; Farmers To Get Rs 10/Litre, Samajwadi Party Takes Jibe

Videos

Jhansi Crash Mystery Solved: Dashcam Footage Shows How Aban Ahmed’s Car Lost Control
Parliament Storm: Jharkhand Student Row Sparks BJP-Congress Clash as Lok Sabha Adjourned
Jharkhand Student Row: BJP-NDA Protest Erupts Outside Parliament Over Alleged Crackdown
Air India Safety Alert: Pilot Tests Positive for Marijuana After 300-Foot Mid-Air Altitude Loss
Jharkhand Exam Scam: JPSC Fraud Probe Reveals Alleged ₹55 Lakh Selection Rate Card

Photo Gallery

25°C
New Delhi
Rain: 100mm
Humidity: 97%
Wind: WNW 47km/h
See Today's Weather
powered by
Accu Weather
Embed widget