Explorer

'PM Modi Refused Exception To Prime Minister': Kiren Rijiju On Bills To Sack Jailed Leaders

Union Minister Rijiju revealed PM Modi rejected an exemption for the prime minister from new bills that would remove ministers, including the CMs and PM, if jailed for serious offenses.

Union minister Kiren Rijiju on Saturday disclosed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi rturned down a proposal that would have exempted him from the new bills regarding the removal of Chief Ministers, PM, and other ministers if they are jailed for serious offences.

According to Rijiju, when the Cabinet discussed the bills, a recommendation was made to keep the Prime Minister outside the ambit of the legislation. However, PM Modi did not agree, saying that a prime minister is also a citizen of the country.

“PM Modi told the cabinet that the recommendation is to keep the prime minister out of this bill, but he did not agree. PM Modi refused to give an exception to the prime minister. The PM is also a citizen, and he should not have special protection,” Rijiju told ANI.

"Most of the CMs are from our party. If they do something wrong, they have to leave their position. Ethics should also mean something. The Opposition would have welcomed this bill had they kept ethics at the centre," he added.

What The Bills Propose

The three bills – the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, The Jammu & Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill and The Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill – propose that any sitting minister, chief minister or even the Prime Minister would lose their position if they are arrested or detained for 30 consecutive days in connection with an offence that carries a minimum punishment of five years or more.

The bills were tabled by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in an intensely charged Parliament session. Opposition MPs protested against the bills, with some tearing up copies of the draft legislation and throwing them toward the Home Minister.

Despite the uproar, the bills were introduced through a voice vote and later referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for further scrutiny.

Leaders across the Opposition have slammed the proposed amendments, describing them as “draconian” and “unconstitutional.” They alleged that the move is politically motivated and could be used unfairly to target chief ministers in states governed by the Opposition, citing the growing influence of central investigative agencies.

About the author ABP Live News

ABP Live News delivers round-the-clock coverage of India and the world, tracking politics, policy, governance, crime, courts and breaking developments, while offering sharp, verified reporting that helps readers stay informed, aware and connected to the stories shaping public life.

Read More

Top Headlines

‘No Assurance, No Talks’: Wangchuk Warns Of Fresh Agitation Over Ladakh From Sept 19
‘No Assurance, No Talks’: Wangchuk Warns Of Fresh Agitation Over Ladakh
Delhi Court Orders Money Laundering Charges Against Lalu, Rabri, Tejashwi In IRCTC Scam Case
Delhi Court Orders Money Laundering Charges Against Lalu, Rabri, Tejashwi In IRCTC Scam Case
Karnataka Orders Only 2 Stanzas Of Vande Mataram At Govt Events, Sets VIP Exceptions
Karnataka Orders Only 2 Stanzas Of Vande Mataram At Govt Events, Sets VIP Exceptions
‘It’s His Wish’: Akhilesh Yadav On Akash Anand Joining SP Rumours After Mayawati’s Fresh Expulsion
Akhilesh Sends Open Invite To Akash Anand After Mayawati Expels Him From BSP

Videos

Mumbai Airport Encroachment Row: MMRDA Says No Permission for Religious Structure
Mumbai Airport Land Row: MMRDA Orders Removal of Unauthorised Prayer Shed Near Terminal 2
BRICS Summit Debate: Manish Tewari Calls for AI Guardrails, BJP Hits Back at Congress
AI Trend : Politicians Join ChatGPT Craze With Retro Looks
Ujjain Khade Hanuman Ji: 150-Year-Old Idol Remains Unmoved, Administration Puts Shifting Plan on Hold

Photo Gallery

25°C
New Delhi
Rain: 100mm
Humidity: 97%
Wind: WNW 47km/h
See Today's Weather
powered by
Accu Weather
Embed widget