Explorer

Electoral bond scheme a policy decision, Centre tells SC; order reserved for Friday

The government's electoral bond scheme for political funding is a "policy decision" and it can't be "faulted" for taking it, the Centre Thursday told the Supreme Court, which reserved the order on a PIL challenging its validity.

The Supreme Court will pass an order on the legality of the electoral bonds scheme on Friday.
The court has heard the arguments from the Centre and the petitioners.
The petitioners have moved the court seeking either a stay on the scheme or some other transparent alternative for funding of political parties.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court will pass an order on the legality of the electoral bonds scheme on Friday. The apex court has heard the arguments from the Centre and the petitioners. The petitioners have moved the court seeking either a stay on the scheme or some other transparent alternative for funding of political parties. The Centre told the top court that the government's electoral bond scheme for political funding is a "policy decision"  and it can't be "faulted" for taking it. A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said it would pronounce its order Friday on the plea filed by NGO, Association of Democratic Reforms (ADR). The NGO, which has challenged the validity of the scheme, has sought interim relief including that either the issuance of electoral bonds be stayed or the names of the donors be made public to ensure transparency in the poll process. Attorney General K K Venugopal, appearing for the Centre, supported the scheme saying the purpose behind it is to eliminate the use of black money in elections. "So far as the electoral bond scheme is concerned, it is the matter of policy decision of the government and no government can be faulted for taking policy decision," Venugopal said, adding the court can scrutinize the scheme after elections. The EC, represented by senior lawyer Rakesh Dwivedi, had opposed Centre's submissions and said secrecy allowed in the electoral bonds scheme "legalises anonymity". "Anonymity must go. We want transparency. We want reforms. We cannot go one step forward and two steps backwards. We want free and fair polls," Dwivedi had said, adding that the poll panel was not against the scheme as such, rather it was opposed to "anonymity attached to it". The Centre and the Election Commission had taken contrary stands in the Supreme Court on Wednesday over political funding with the government wanting to maintain anonymity of the donors of electoral bonds and the poll panel batting for revealing the names of donors for transparency. The EC, which opposed the anonymous electoral bonds in an affidavit in 2017, on Wednesday, told the Supreme Court that it is not against the bonds themselves, and, instead, opposes the principle of anonymity of the bond donor and redeemer. The Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi cited many sections in the Election Commission (EC) affidavit and asked the EC's counsel to double-check on what he was saying. In his reply, the EC counsel insisted that he is absolutely sure that the Commission is not against electoral bonds, but is opposed to the veil of anonymity associated with such bonds. During a recent hearing on the electoral bonds issue in the Supreme Court, the EC informed the court regarding its opposition to the anonymous electoral bonds and cited it's affidavit filed with the Law Ministry in 2017. In the affidavit, the EC termed introduction of electoral bonds a retrogade step. The poll panel expressed concern over the non-disclosure of donor identity and clauses that may allow for shell companies and foreign entities to fund and influence Indian political parties and elections. The government, however, contended before the apex court on Wednesday that the anonymity of the donor in case of electoral bonds is to prevent political victimisation of the donor. (With inputs from agencies)
View More
Advertisement
Advertisement
25°C
New Delhi
Rain: 100mm
Humidity: 97%
Wind: WNW 47km/h
See Today's Weather
powered by
Accu Weather
Advertisement

Top Headlines

Hathras Stampede: Two Women Among Six Arrested, Bhole Baba's Criminal History Being Investigated
Hathras Stampede: Two Women Among Six Arrested, Bhole Baba's Criminal History Being Investigated
Rahul Gandhi To Visit Hathras, Meet Families Of Satsang Stampede Victims
Rahul Gandhi To Visit Hathras, Meet Families Of Satsang Stampede Victims
Tejashwi's 'Jungle Raj' Dig At Nitish Kumar, PM Modi As 10th Bridge In Bihar Crumbles In 15 Days
Tejashwi's 'Jungle Raj' Dig At Nitish Kumar, PM Modi As 10th Bridge In Bihar Crumbles In 15 Days
'Respecting LAC Essential’, Jaishankar Tells Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi In Astana
'Respecting LAC Essential’, Jaishankar Tells Chinese Foreign Minister In Astana
Advertisement
ABP Premium

Videos

Pet Talks: Does Separation Anxiety Affect Only Dogs or Humans Too? What Is Separation Anxiety?Nose Jobs Explained With Before and After Results Of Celebrities | ABP Health LiveCelebrations All Across The Country As Team India Reaches It's Homeland | ABP NewsHello Doc: Why are Youngsters Losing Hair? Can Salon Treatments Promote Hair Growth?

Photo Gallery

Embed widget