Breaking: Has the Supreme Court’s decision on stray dogs struck the right balance between compassion and public safety?

A major controversy has erupted across India after the Supreme Court ruled that sterilized and vaccinated stray dogs can be released back onto the streets. This decision, delivered on 22 August, was initially limited to Delhi-NCR but now extends nationwide, affecting all states and union territories. The judgment has sparked a heated debate between dog lovers and concerned citizens. Animal rights activists hailed the verdict as a win for compassion, while many citizens questioned their own rights to safety. Alarming incidents have surfaced – including a student being attacked in Kanpur, a child in Udaipur mauled by strays, and citizens in housing societies clashing over feeding stray dogs in public spaces. The Supreme Court clarified that stray dogs must be sterilized and vaccinated before release, and feeding must be done at designated spots. However, the ambiguity around identifying 'aggressive' dogs remains a grey area, leaving room for further conflict. While dog lovers celebrated emotionally, others fear for the safety of children and the elderly in public areas. As the debate intensifies, the Court has promised a clear definition of ‘aggressive’ dogs within 8 weeks, and discussions are underway for a national stray dog policy.