Explorer

Wikipedia Put On Notice By Govt Over Bias, Inaccuracies: Here's What We Know So Far

The government has written to Wikipedia highlighting a number of complaints of bias and inaccuracy.

Wikipedia has recently come under a lot of fire over the accusations of being biased and inaccurate. Especially with the US Presidential Elections going on, X owner Elon Musk has called it out for supporting far-Left theories. Now, the Indian government has put Wikipedia on notice. According to ANI, the government has written to Wikipedia highlighting a number of complaints of bias and inaccuracy. In the letter, the Centre pointed out that a small group of people have editorial control over the website. 

It has asked the free public encyclopedia why it shouldn't be treated as a publisher instead of an intermediary. 

Wikipedia has yet to respond to the Indian government over these complaints. 

ALSO READ | Elon Musk’s $1-Million Daily Voter Giveaway Sanctioned By Judge Ahead Of US Election

Delhi High Court To Block Wikipedia?

Earlier in September, the Delhi High Court had warned Wikipedia that it would block the website if it failed to comply with Indian laws. The High Court issued a contempt of court notice against Wikipedia. This strong move came after Wikipedia failed to furnish details of who edited the page of the news agency Asian News International (ANI).

The agency filed a defamation lawsuit against Wikipedia, alleging that the platform permitted defamatory edits labelling the news organization as a "government propaganda tool."

The Delhi High Court judge told Wikipedia counsel, "I will impose contempt... It is not a question of Defendant No 1 [Wikipedia] not being an entity in India. We will close your business transactions here. We will ask the govt to block Wikipedia... Earlier also you people have taken this argument. If you don't like India, please don't work in India." This statement came on the heels of Wikipedia not disclosing details of three subscriber accounts who made the edit on ANI's page.

ANI argues that the description’s content is defamatory and that Wikipedia, as a publicly used platform and intermediary, should not operate like a private-sector entity.

Top Headlines

Xiaomi FX Mini LED TV Review: A Mini LED Wolf In Budget Clothing
Xiaomi FX Mini LED TV Review: A Mini LED Wolf In Budget Clothing
BGMI's Biggest Update Yet Lets You Swing, Climb And Fight Like Spider-Man
BGMI's Biggest Update Yet Lets You Swing, Climb And Fight Like Spider-Man
Google Is Using Your Photos And Voice To Train Its AI: Here Is How To Stop It
Google Is Using Your Photos And Voice To Train Its AI: Here Is How To Stop It
Want iPhone 17 Pro For Free? This Is Your Window Before The Deal Closes
Want iPhone 17 Pro For Free? This Is Your Window Before The Deal Closes

Videos

Ayodhya Watch: Govind Dev Giri Meets Champat Rai as Temple Donation Probe Draws Fresh Focus
Global Flash: Iran Rejects Trump’s Warning as New Statements Signal Rising Diplomatic Tensions
Global Alert: Strategic Iranian Sites Hit as Fresh Gulf Escalation Raises Global Security Concerns
Global Tension: US-Iran Frictions Deepen as Regional Security Concerns Rise During State Funeral
Monsoon Alert: Torrential Rain Floods Cities as Rising Waters Leave Large Parts of India Struggling

Photo Gallery

25°C
New Delhi
Rain: 100mm
Humidity: 97%
Wind: WNW 47km/h
See Today's Weather
powered by
Accu Weather
Embed widget