Complainant Sujata Bhat Appears Before SIT Amid Twists In Dharmasthala Case

Sujata Bhat, who reported her daughter Ananya missing in 2003 from Dharmasthala, was questioned by the SIT investigating alleged murders and rapes in the area.

Officials confirmed that Sujata was summoned as part of the ongoing investigation.

Source : PTI

Mangaluru, Aug 26 (PTI) Sujata Bhat, who had complained about the alleged disappearance of her daughter in Dharmasthala, appeared before the Special Investigation Team (SIT) in Belthangady on Tuesday, officials said. The SIT has been investigating the case involving allegations of multiple burials, murders and rapes in Dharmasthala, which has drawn wide public and political attention.

Officials confirmed that Sujata was summoned as part of the ongoing investigation. She appeared for questioning.

According to police, Sujata filed a complaint on July 15, 2025 at Dharmasthala Police Station, claiming that her daughter Ananya Bhat, a medical student, went missing from the Dharmasthala temple premises in 2003.

Following a review, the Director General and Inspector General of Police, transferred the case to the SIT for further investigation.

Sujata has since made contradictory statements, reportedly saying she never had a daughter and that a false complaint was filed at the instigation of others.

She later retracted that statement as well.

The case has seen multiple twists, including disputes over the very existence of Ananya and contradictory witness statements.

SIT officials said questioning will continue as they examine evidence and testimony in connection with the disappearance.

A controversy erupted after a complainant, later identified as C N Chinnaiah and arrested on charges of perjury, claimed burying a number of bodies, including those of women with signs of sexual assault in Dharmasthala over a period of time, with the implications pointing towards the administrators of the local temple.

The BJP had protested against targeting the temple. Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar had also warned of action if the complaint was false.

Veerendra Heggade, the Dharmadhikari or the custodian of the temple too had welcomed the constitution of the SIT. 

(This report has been published as part of the auto-generated syndicate wire feed. Apart from the headline, no editing has been done in the copy by ABP Live.)