ICMR Slams Study On 'Serious' Side-Effects Of Covaxin, Demands Apology From BHU Professors

The study stated that nearly a third of 926 individuals who received the India-made Covaxin Covid-19 vaccine reported serious side-effects.

ICMR Director General Dr Rajiv Bahl criticised the study for its poor methodology and design.

The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has distanced itself from a follow-up study by two Benares Hindu University professors on the long-term safety analysis of Covaxin in adults and adolescents.

ICMR Director General Dr Rajiv Bahl criticised the study for its poor methodology and design, and clarified the article misleadingly and erroneously acknowledges ICMR. 
 
The study stated that nearly a third of 926 individuals who received the India-made Covaxin Covid-19 vaccine reported serious side-effects. It claimed that around one per cent of respondents reported strokes and an autoimmune disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome, which causes weakness in nerves in the arms and legs.

Dr Bahl said the study had no control arm of unvaccinated individuals for comparing the rates of events between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. 

Wow. This is damning. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has written to the Editor of Drug Safety Journal to retract the recently published Covaxin side effects study by authors from Banaras Hindu University.@Kishor_Ayu & @sankha_shubhra

The ICMR has also written to… https://t.co/KhxzdNgPf6 pic.twitter.com/gaO2x0gqHN

— TheLiverDoc (@theliverdr) May 20, 2024

Hence, the reported events in the study cannot be linked or attributed to COVID-19 vaccination. 

"The ICMR is not associated with the study and has not provided any financial or technical support for the research," Dr Bahl said. 

The ICMR DG has written a letter to the authors of the paper and Editor of the journal to immediately remove the acknowledgement to ICMR and publish an erratum. 

Dr Bahl said that ICMR was acknowledged for research support without any prior approval of or intimation to ICMR, which is inappropriate and unacceptable. He stated that ICMR cannot be associated with this poorly designed study which purports to present a safety analysis of Covaxin due to several critical flaws. 

He said the study does not even provide background rates of observed events in the population and added that the baseline information of the participants was missing. 

"The study tool used is inconsistent with 'Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)' as defined in the reference provided in the paper for AESI. The method of data collection has a high risk of bias," he said. 

"Study participants were contacted telephonically one year after vaccination and their responses were recorded without any confirmation with clinical records or by physician examination," he pointed out. 

"The authors have been urged to immediately rectify the acknowledgment to ICMR and publish an erratum. Additionally, they are asked to address the methodological concerns raised. Failure to do so may prompt ICMR to consider legal and administrative action," Dr Bahl said. 

All About the Study On Covaxin

The research paper, titled 'Long-Term Safety Analysis of the BBVl52 Coronavirus Vaccine in Adolescents and Adults: Findings from a l-Year Prospective Study in North India' stated that the participants who received Covaxin reported 'adverse events of special interest,' or AESI. 

The study, conducted by researchers from the Banaras Hindu University from January 2022 to August 2023, stated that nearly 50 per cent of 926 study participants in the study complained of infections during the follow-up period, predominated by viral upper respiratory tract infections. 

Serious adverse events, which included stroke and Guillain-Barre syndrome, were reported in one per cent of individuals, the study, which looked at long-term safety of the BBV152 (Covaxin) vaccine in adolescents and adults, claimed. The study involved 635 adolescents and 291 adults, who received the BBV152 vaccine.