'We'll Decide What Goes On SC Building': CJI Rejects Plea On Ashok Chakra

The Supreme Court rejected a plea seeking installation of the Ashok Chakra on its building, with CJI Surya Kant saying the court will decide such matters.

The Supreme Court rejected the plea, saying displays on its premises are an administrative matter.

Source : Twitter

Show Quick Read

Key points generated by AI, verified by newsroom

• Supreme Court rejected plea for National Emblem installation.
• Petitioner sought emblem's placement on the apex court building.
• Court stated emblem placement falls under its administrative domain.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to entertain a plea concerning the installation of the Ashok Chakra (National Emblem) on the building of the apex court, with Chief Justice of India Surya Kant remarking that the court itself would decide such matters.

Hearing a plea filed by petitioner-in-person Badaravada Venugopal, also known as Baba Khatarnak, the CJI said, "Supreme Court ke gate pe kya lagana hai hum dekh lenge... aap duniya mein itni samasyaein hai unka dhyan rakhiye' (We will decide what should be placed at the Supreme Court gate; there are so many problems in the world, focus on those)." The plea related to the installation of the National Emblem on the main dome of the Supreme Court, and what the petitioner described as the "constitutional identity of courts".

According to the court record, Venugopal had earlier moved a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions on the issue.

On March 23, the Supreme Court disposed of the petition, observing that the matter essentially required examination on the administrative side and directing the secretary general of the court to place an appropriate note before the competent authority.

Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application seeking the status and effective implementation of the administrative directions issued by the court on March 23 concerning the installation of the National Emblem on the apex court's main dome.

The application was lodged by the registrar on July 3 under the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Venugopal then filed an appeal against the registrar's order, which came up before the bench on Tuesday.

The bench, however, was not inclined to interfere and rejected the plea, indicating that issues relating to what is displayed on the Supreme Court premises fall within the court's own administrative domain. 

(This report has been published as part of the auto-generated syndicate wire feed. Apart from the headline, no editing has been done in the copy by ABP Live.)