Explorer

'We'll Decide What Goes On SC Building': CJI Rejects Plea On Ashok Chakra

The Supreme Court rejected a plea seeking installation of the Ashok Chakra on its building, with CJI Surya Kant saying the court will decide such matters.

Show Quick Read
Key points generated by AI, verified by newsroom
  • Supreme Court rejected plea for National Emblem installation.
  • Petitioner sought emblem's placement on the apex court building.
  • Court stated emblem placement falls under its administrative domain.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to entertain a plea concerning the installation of the Ashok Chakra (National Emblem) on the building of the apex court, with Chief Justice of India Surya Kant remarking that the court itself would decide such matters.

Hearing a plea filed by petitioner-in-person Badaravada Venugopal, also known as Baba Khatarnak, the CJI said, "Supreme Court ke gate pe kya lagana hai hum dekh lenge... aap duniya mein itni samasyaein hai unka dhyan rakhiye' (We will decide what should be placed at the Supreme Court gate; there are so many problems in the world, focus on those)." The plea related to the installation of the National Emblem on the main dome of the Supreme Court, and what the petitioner described as the "constitutional identity of courts".

According to the court record, Venugopal had earlier moved a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions on the issue.

On March 23, the Supreme Court disposed of the petition, observing that the matter essentially required examination on the administrative side and directing the secretary general of the court to place an appropriate note before the competent authority.

Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application seeking the status and effective implementation of the administrative directions issued by the court on March 23 concerning the installation of the National Emblem on the apex court's main dome.

The application was lodged by the registrar on July 3 under the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Venugopal then filed an appeal against the registrar's order, which came up before the bench on Tuesday.

The bench, however, was not inclined to interfere and rejected the plea, indicating that issues relating to what is displayed on the Supreme Court premises fall within the court's own administrative domain. 

(This report has been published as part of the auto-generated syndicate wire feed. Apart from the headline, no editing has been done in the copy by ABP Live.)

Advertisement

Top Headlines

Snapped power line in waterlogged area electrocutes mother-child in Rishikesh, engineer suspended
Snapped power line in waterlogged area electrocutes mother-child in Rishikesh, engineer suspended
YEIDA plans medical hub, university township, Taiwan City; move to create new investment avenues
YEIDA plans medical hub, university township, Taiwan City; move to create new investment avenues
Amitabh Bachchan hails UP Police anthem 'Khaki Ka Sitara'
Amitabh Bachchan hails UP Police anthem 'Khaki Ka Sitara'
Police officer, journalist among 4 held for kidnapping Odisha businessman
Police officer, journalist among 4 held for kidnapping Odisha businessman
Advertisement

Videos

Twisha Sharma Case: CBI Chargesheet Says Death Was Suicide
Breaking News: Ujjain Mahakal Temple Panic After Current Rumour, Devotees Injured During Nag Panchami Rush
Breaking News: Ujjain Mahakal Crowd Panic Leaves 13 Injured Amid Current Rumour, Crowd Management Questions Rise9
Breaking: Sawan Monday Turns Tragic as Lakhisarai Stampede, Birbhum Fire and Ujjain Chaos Raise Alarm
Breaking News: NTA Faces Fresh Heat as NSUI Protests UGC NET Re-Exam, Demands Accountability
Advertisement

Photo Gallery

Advertisement
25°C
New Delhi
Rain: 100mm
Humidity: 97%
Wind: WNW 47km/h
See Today's Weather
powered by
Accu Weather
Embed widget