Explorer
Advertisement
Defamation case: Setback to Kejriwal as HC refuses to stay trial court proceedings
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Thursday refused to stay trial court proceedings in connection with a criminal defamation complaint filed against Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia.
- Justice I S Mehta, however, granted exemption to the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders from personal appearance on April 6 before the trial court in the matter. "Let the proceedings before the trial court go on.
- "I am giving relief that they (Kejriwal and Sisodia) are exempted from appearing in person before the trial court on April 6," the court said.
- It said that the two will file an exemption application through their counsel before the trial court, which should be decided as per law. The court's direction were issued during hearing of a petition filed by the two AAP leaders, who sought quashing of the criminal defamation complaint filed by advocate Surender Kumar Sharma.
- The two also sought a stay on the proceedings before the trial court, which is yet to frame issue in the matter. The leaders contended that the order of the trial court summoning them was "erroneous". They also said that a false complaint has been filed against the chief minister and his deputy.
- The high court today issued notice to complainant Sharma in the matter and asked him to file his response by July 28. It also asked the Delhi police to file status report in the matter.
- Besides Kejriwal and Sisodia, the complainant has also named Yogendra Yadav in his complaint. Yadav was a member of the National Executive of the AAP until 2015, when he was expelled for alleged anti-party activities. Later, he floated his own party Swaraj India -- which is going to contest municipal corporations election in Delhi.
- Sharma had alleged that in 2013 he was approached by volunteers of AAP who had asked him to contest the Delhi Assembly elections on a party ticket, saying Kejriwal was pleased with his social services.
- He filled up the application form to contest the polls after being told by Sisodia and Yadav that AAP's Political Affairs Committee had decided to give him the ticket. However, it was later denied to him.
- On October 14, 2013 the complainant claimed, articles in leading newspapers carried "defamatory, unlawful and derogatory words used by the accused persons" which have lowered his reputation in the Bar and the society.
- Opposing the complaint, the AAP leaders submitted that cancellation or allotment of an election ticket is the prerogative of the party.
Follow Breaking News on ABP Live for more latest stories and trending topics. Watch breaking news and top headlines online on ABP News LIVE TV
View More
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Top Headlines
Cities
India
Cities
Cities
Advertisement