SC To Hear Maharashtra’s Plea On July 24 Against Acquittal Of All Accused In 2006 Mumbai Train Blasts
Supreme Court to hear Maharashtra’s plea on July 24 against Bombay HC verdict acquitting all 12 accused in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case that killed over 180 people. State cites serious concerns.
New Delhi, Jul 22 (PTI) The Supreme Court will hear the Maharashtra government's plea against the Bombay High Court verdict acquitting all 12 accused in the 2006 Mumbai train bomb blasts case on July 24.
A bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria on Tuesday took note of the urgent mentioning of the state’s appeal against the High Court’s July 21 verdict by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and said it will be listed for Thursday.
"It is a serious matter. The SLP (special leave petition) is ready. Please list it tomorrow. There is urgency... Still there are some important issues to be looked at," the law officer said.
The CJI referred to newspaper reports of eight persons being released from prison following the high court judgment.
On Monday, a special high court bench of Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak acquitted all the 12 accused, saying the prosecution utterly failed to prove the case and it was "hard to believe the accused committed the crime".
Of the 12, five had been sentenced to death and seven to life imprisonment by the special court. One of the death row convicts died in 2021.
More than 180 people were killed when seven blasts ripped through Mumbai local trains at various locations on the western line on July 11, 2006.
The high court allowed the appeals filed by the accused challenging their conviction and sentences imposed on them by a special court in 2015.
The high court verdict came as a major embarrassment to the Maharashtra ATS which probed the case. The agency claimed that the accused were members of the banned outfit Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) and hatched the conspiracy with Pakistani members of the terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT).
In its damning indictment of the prosecution's case, the high court declared all confessional statements of the accused as inadmissible and suggested "copying”.
Further eroding the credibility of the confessions, the court said the accused had established that torture was inflicted upon them to extort these confessional statements.
(This report has been published as part of the auto-generated syndicate wire feed. Apart from the headline, no editing has been done in the copy by ABP Live.)
Top Headlines
