Explorer

Lifetime Ban On Politicians Convicted In Criminal Cases To Continue? What Centre Told Supreme Court

The Centre opposed a Supreme Court plea to impose lifetime bans on convicted politicians, stating that such a measure falls solely within Parliament's authority.

The Centre on Wednesday opposed a plea filed in the Supreme Court that sought to impose a life ban on convicted politicians, arguing such a disqualification was solely within the domain of Parliament. 

The Centre further said in an affidavit filed in court that the prayer in the plea amounted to re-writing of the statute or directing the Parliament to frame legislation in a particular manner which was wholly beyond the powers of judicial review, reported PTI. 

"The question whether a lifetime ban would be appropriate or not is a question that is solely within the domain of the parliament," the affidavit said.

ALSO READ | PM Modi To Visit Russia On May 9 To Attend Great Patriotic War Anniversary: Report

It added that by confining the operation of penalty to an appropriate length of time, deterrence was ensured while undue harshness was avoided. 

The Centre argued there was nothing inherently unconstitutional in limiting the effect of penalties by time and it was a settled principle of law that penalties were limited either by time or by quantum.

"It is submitted that issues raised by the petitioner have wide-ranging ramifications and clearly fall within the legislative policy of Parliament and the contours of judicial review would be suitably altered in such regard," the affidavit said.

ALSO READ | Telangana CM Reddy Meets PM Modi, Seeks Nod For Hyderabad Metro Expansion & Semiconductor Hub

The plea, filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay sought a life ban on convicted politicians aside from the expeditious disposal of criminal cases against MPs and MLAs in the country.

Meanwhile, the Center pointed out that the top court had consistently held that the legislative choice over one option or the other couldn't be questioned in courts over its efficacy or otherwise.

According to the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Section 8(1), the period of disqualification was six years from the date of conviction or in case of imprisonment, six years from the date of release, it added.

View More
Advertisement
Advertisement
Sat Mar 29, 2:07 pm
connaught place
28.2°
Precipitation: 0 mm    Humidity: 18%   Wind: W 16.9 km/h
See Today's Weather
Powered By:
Accu Weather
Advertisement

Top Headlines

Sunita Williams' Return To Earth Delayed As SpaceX Scrubs Crew-10 Launch Due To Technical Issue
Sunita Williams' Return To Earth Delayed As SpaceX Scrubs Crew-10 Launch Due To Technical Issue
Pakistan Train Hijack Ends As Military Rescues 190 Hostages, 21 Passengers, 33 Militants Killed
Pakistan Train Hijack Ends As Military Rescues 190 Hostages, 21 Passengers, 33 Militants Killed
IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw Welcomes Starlink To India: 'Will Be Useful For Remote Railway Projects'
IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw Welcomes Starlink To India: 'Will Be Useful For Remote Railway Projects'
After Money Laundering Probe, Mumbai's Lilavati Hospital Rocked By 'Black Magic', 'Secret Urns' Allegations
After Money Laundering Probe, Mumbai's Lilavati Hospital Rocked By 'Black Magic', 'Secret Urns' Allegations
Advertisement
ABP Premium

Videos

Breaking News: Political Tensions Escalate Over Holi and Jumma Prayers Ahead of Festival | ABP NewsUproar On Holi: JDU Spokesperson Advises Own Leader Over Anjum Ara’s Statement on Holi and RamzanPakistan Train Hijack: Pakistan Army Rescues 155 Hostages from Hijacked Train Amid BLA StandoffBreaking News: Delhi BJP MLA Sparks Controversy Over Jumma Prayers and Holi Celebration | ABP NEWS

Photo Gallery

Embed widget