Madras HC Declares Former TN CM O Panneerselvam's Son's 2019 Lok Sabha Victory Invalid

Ravindranath, who is the son of deposed AIADMK leader and former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister O Panneerselvam, had won from Tamil Nadu's Theni parliamentary constituency in 2019.

The Madras HC declared expelled AIADMK member OP Ravindranath's victory in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections null and void.

New Delhi: The Madras High Court on Thursday declared expelled AIADMK member OP Ravindranath's victory in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections null and void while allowing an election petition filed against him, reported PTI.

Ravindranath, who is the son of deposed AIADMK leader and former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister O Panneerselvam, had won from Tamil Nadu's Theni parliamentary constituency in 2019.

As per the agency, the petition was filed by one P Milany from the Theni constituency.

According to advocate V Arun, counsel for Milany, the petitioner contended that Ravindhranath while filing his nomination for the election had suppressed various materials, including the particulars of his movable and immovable assets and liabilities, and those of his family members. The suppression of facts materially affected the election, the lawyer added.

Tamil Nadu | Lawyer of Petitioner, V Arun on Madras High Court Declares Paneerselva’s Son Lok Sabha victory invalid says, "The election petition was filed by one of the elector of the Theni constituency... According to the law mandates, whoever the candidate is, they have to… pic.twitter.com/YQFgW2XH3j

— ANI (@ANI) July 6, 2023

While giving the judgment, Justice SS Sundar said, "Admittedly, in this case, as spoken by the Returning Officer, the nomination of 3rd respondent (Ravindhranath) was accepted by the Returning Officer on the date of scrutiny. On the date of scrutiny, the objection raised by a third party, Arappor Iyakkam, is a valid objection and the non-disclosure/false disclosure is admitted by the 3rd respondent himself by submitting an affidavit after scrutiny contrary to statutory provisions and the guidelines given in Hand Book for Returning Officer."

"This shows that the Returning Officer, who was supposed to consider the objection on the date of scrutiny of nomination, failed to do that and has accepted the nomination without an explanation or correction. As a consequence, this court holds that the nomination of 3rd respondent has been improperly accepted by the Returning Officer," the judge added.

Meanwhile, the counsel appearing for Ravindhranath argued that the suppression has not materially affected the result of the election.

The court said the counsel had pointed out that the 3rd respondent won the election with a huge margin of 76,000 votes, and that his election in this case cannot be declared void on the ground of suppression.

According to PTI, the judge said that the Supreme Court, in an earlier case, has rejected the contention of the returned candidate that under Section 100[1][d] of the RP Act, 1951, there must be proof that the result of the election was materially affected by the improper acceptance of the nomination.

The court said, "Suppression is proved. As a consequence, this court holds that the nomination of the returned candidate had been improperly accepted. In view of the conclusions reached above on all issues, this court has to allow the election petition and declare the election of the 3rd respondent/returned candidate as void."

"In the result, the Election Petition in ELP.No.4/2019 is allowed and the election of 3rd respondent/Returned Candidate on 23.05.2019 from No.33, Theni Parliamentary Constituency is declared as null and void," the judge ruled.