Explorer

ICC U19 World Cup 2024: Controversy Erupts With ‘Obstructing The Field’ Dismissal In England vs Zimbabwe Clash- WATCH

Controversy arose in the ICC U19 World Cup 2024 as a 'Obstructing the Field' decision sparked debate regarding 'Sportsmanship' during the England vs Zimbabwe match.

In the 38th match of the Super Six, Group 2 of the ICC Under 19 Men’s Cricket World Cup 2024 in Potchefstroom on February 3 (Saturday), England faced Zimbabwe in a game marked by a controversial 'obstructing the field' decision. England, batting first, posted a total of 237/7 in their allotted 50 overs and went on to secure a dominant 146-run victory by dismissing Zimbabwe for 91. However, the match was marred by a controversial incident that raised questions about the concept of 'sportsmanship' in cricket.

The controversial moment occurred in the 17th over of England’s innings when No.4 batter Hamza Shaikh faced Zimbabwe’s left-arm spinner Ryan Simbi. After an unsuccessful stroke, the ball landed near Hamza's feet, prompting Zimbabwe wicketkeeper Ryan Kamwemba to move towards the stationary ball. Hamza gestured with his right hand, indicating that he would pick the ball. He then picked up the ball and flicked it to Kamwemba, who was positioned next to him.

Here's A Clip Of The Controversial Incident:

Although this action is not uncommon in the game, traditionalists often disapprove, suggesting that as a batter, one should leave the fielders to collect the ball, regardless of its location. Kamwemba appealed, leading the umpires to convene and refer the decision to the third umpire, who deemed it out under the 'obstructing the field' rule (Rule 37.4), stating that a batter is out if they use the bat or any part of their person to return the ball to a fielder without the fielder's consent.

Here’s What Rule 37.4 (Returning the ball to a fielder) Of The Laws of Cricket (MCC) Says: 

“Either batter is out Obstructing the field if, at any time while the ball is in play and, without the consent of a fielder, he/she uses the bat or any part of his/her person to return the ball to any fielder.”

The dismissal, perceived by many as against the 'spirit' of the game, sparked widespread criticism on social media. Former England cricketer Stuart Broad expressed his disagreement, stating that passing a stationary ball back to the fielder should not result in an obstructing the field dismissal. Notably, before 2017, this type of wicket would have been categorised under the 'handled the ball' mode of dismissal, but a change in the laws merged the two together.

View More
Advertisement
Advertisement
25°C
New Delhi
Rain: 100mm
Humidity: 97%
Wind: WNW 47km/h
See Today's Weather
powered by
Accu Weather
Advertisement

Top Headlines

Maharashtra Elections: With 50 Rebels In Fray, Can Mahayuti And Maha Vikas Aghadi Contain The Dissent?
Maharashtra Elections: With 50 Rebels In Fray, Can Mahayuti And Maha Vikas Aghadi Contain The Dissent?
India Confirms Meeting Between India, Canada Intel Officials, But Maintains No Evidence Shared On Nijjar Case
India Confirms Meeting Between India, Canada Intel Officials, But Maintains No Evidence Shared On Nijjar Case
Jharkhand Elections: INDIA Bloc Arrives At Seat-Sharing Agreement For Assembly Polls, Friendly Fight In 3 Seats
INDIA Bloc Arrives At Seat-Sharing Agreement For Jharkhand Polls, Friendly Fight In 3 Seats
Pawar Family Hosts Separate Diwali Events For 1st Time As Ajit, Sharad Gear Up For Maharashtra Polls
Pawar Power Split: Pawar Family Hosts Two Diwalis For 1st Time As Ajit, Sharad Gear Up For Polls
Advertisement
ABP Premium

Videos

Maharashtra Election: If Numbers Are Needed, Who Will You Choose? Devendra Fadnavis Makes a 'Prediction'Maharashtra Election: Listen to Raj Thackeray's Take On Who Will Be Maharashtra's Next CM | Raj Thackeray ExclusiveMaharashtra Election: Ajit Pawar Speaks Out on Allegations of Collusion with Sharad Pawar | Ajit Pawar ExclusiveChirag Paswan Exclusive Interview: Responds with Laughter on Marriage, Uncle, Nitish & PM Modi | ABP LIVE

Photo Gallery

Embed widget