Explorer

Ishrat Jahan Case: CBI Court Discharges 3 Gujarat Cops Accused Of 'Fake Encounter'

Ishrat Jahan, a 19-year-old woman from Mumbra near Mumbai, was killed by Gujarat police in an 'encounter' near Ahmedabad on June 15, 2004.

Ahmedabad: A special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court in Ahmedabad on Wednesday discharged three cops accused in the 2004 Ishrat Jahan alleged fake encounter case. The ruling by court came days after three police officials — IPS officer GL Singhal, retired police officer Tarun Barot, and Anaju Chaudhari — filed the discharge applications on March 20. 

Ishrat Jahan, a 19-year-old woman from Mumbra near Mumbai, was killed along with Javed Shaikh alias Pranesh Pillai, Amjadali Akbarali Rana and Zeeshan Johar by Gujarat police in an 'encounter' near Ahmedabad on June 15, 2004.

ALSO READ | 'Situation Turning Worse', Says Centre As India Records 56,211 COVID-19 Cases On Tuesday

The police had claimed the four were terrorists who were planning to assassinate the then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

However, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) appointed by High Court concluded that the encounter was fake, after which the CBI registered a case against various police officials.

On Wednesday, a Special CBI judge V R Raval allowed the discharge applications of Singhal, Barot (now retired) and Chaudhary.

"The CBI has not mentioned anything specific against the sanction order (in which the Gujarat government declined sanction to prosecute the three accused) which also leads to believe the act of applicants/accused was in discharge of official duties," the court observed.

Inspector General of Police Singhal, retired police officers Barot and J G Parmar, and Chaudhary had filed applications before the court seeking dropping of proceedings for want of the requisite sanction to prosecute them.

However, Parmar died during the course of hearing in the case.

ALSO READ | Pakistan's Economic Coordination Council Allows Import Of Cotton, Yarn From India

The CBI court further pointed out that there is nothing on record, even prima facie, to suggest that the victims were not terrorists and said that the IB inputs were not genuine.

The court on Wednesday discharged Singhal, Chaudhary and Barot from offences under IPC Sections 120-B (criminal conspiracy), 341, 342, 343 (all for wrongful restraint), 365 (kidnapping or abducting with intent secretly and wrongfully to confine person), 368 (wrongfully concealing or keeping in confinement, kidnapped or abducted person), 302 (murder) and 201 (causing disappearance of evidence of offence).

They were also discharged under sections 25(1)(e) and 27 of the Indian Arms Act.

Top Headlines

Praful Patel Points Finger At Aviation Company In Baramati Plane Crash Tragedy
Praful Patel Points Finger At Aviation Company In Baramati Plane Crash Tragedy
Shivpal Tells UP Deputy CM: ‘Resign If You Feel So Strongly’
Shivpal Tells UP Deputy CM: ‘Resign If You Feel So Strongly’
UP Government Sets Up ‘Kaushal Connect Cell’ To Link Youth With Industry Jobs
UP Government Sets Up ‘Kaushal Connect Cell’ To Link Youth With Industry Jobs
‘We Do Not Want Any Controversy’: IT Ministry Reacts As Galgotias Robodog Row Escalates
‘We Do Not Want Any Controversy’: IT Ministry Reacts As Galgotias Robodog Row Escalates

Videos

Breaking News: UP Deputy CM Brijesh Pathak Calls Touching Brahmin Shikha a Crime
Breaking Update: Sahil’s Mother Demands Arrest of Minor’s Father, Shares Exclusive Footage
Breaking Update: 23-Year-Old Sahil Killed in Delhi Scorpio Hit-and-Run, CCTV Footage Shows
Breaking Update: Salman Khan’s Father Salim Khan Stable in ICU, Doctors Monitoring
Breaking Update: NEET Student’s Family in Bihar Receives Threats Again, CBI Investigating

Photo Gallery

25°C
New Delhi
Rain: 100mm
Humidity: 97%
Wind: WNW 47km/h
See Today's Weather
powered by
Accu Weather
Embed widget