Arbitral Award Dispute: HC Asks SpiceJet MD Ajay Singh To Appear In January
The HC was informed by senior advocate Maninder Singh, representing Maran’s Kal Airways, that judgment debtors SpiceJet and its MD are liable to pay Rs 4.40 crore to the decree holder (Kal Airways)
The Delhi High Court has asked low-cost airline SpiceJet’s Managing Director Ajay Singh to appear before it in January in proceedings relating to a dispute over interest dues on arbitral award of over Rs 570 crore passed in favour of media baron Kalanithi Maran.
“Ajay Singh, the Managing Director, shall remain present on the next date of hearing,” Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri said in the order passed on Monday and listed the matter for further hearing on January 10 next year.
Ajay Singh had earlier also appeared before the high court on August 24.
The high court was informed by senior advocate Maninder Singh, representing Maran’s Kal Airways, that judgment debtors SpiceJet and its MD are liable to pay around Rs 4.40 crore to the decree holder (Kal Airways).
The counsel for SpiceJet, however, disputed the figure and said that the remaining balance dues are Rs 194 crore and that the judgment debtors’ appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is pending consideration.
Senior advocate Amit Sibal, representing SpiceJet and its MD, submitted that the judgment debtors have offered to issue fresh equity shares in SpiceJet Ltd, equivalent to the amount due to the decree holder, to discharge their liability under the arbitral award.
However, the counsel for Kal Airways said the offer was not acceptable to them.
The counsel said the judgment debtor has not shown any bonafide for discharge of the remaining liability under the award.
The high court was hearing an enforcement petition filed by Maran and Kal Airways seeking enforcement of the arbitral award in their favour.
On July 31, the single judge upheld the award announced by the arbitral tribunal on July 20, 2018 in favour of Maran and Kal Airways.
It had said the court was barred from entering into the merits of an award unless there was an error that was apparent on the face of the record or an illegality that goes to the root of the matter.
The single judge’s order was challenged before a division bench of the high court which has refused to stay the decision and the appeal is pending there.
Singh had approached the single judge bench of the high court challenging the arbitral award.
The case dates back to January 2015, when Singh, who owned the airline earlier, bought it back from Maran after it was grounded for months due to a resource crunch.
While the tribunal had asked Maran to pay Singh and the airline Rs 29 crore in penal interest, Singh was asked to refund Rs 579 crore plus interest to Maran.
The tribunal, created in 2016 on the orders of the Delhi High Court to adjudicate the share transfer dispute, had held that there was no breach of a share sale and purchase agreement reached between Maran and current promoter Singh in late January 2015.
In a relief to Singh, the tribunal had, however, rejected Maran's appeal for damages of Rs 1,323 crore from the Gurugram-based carrier.
In February 2015, Maran of the Sun Network and Kal Airways, his investment vehicle, had transferred their 58.46 per cent stake in SpiceJet to Singh for Rs 2 along with Rs 1,500 crore debt liability, after the airline was grounded due to a severe cash crunch.
Singh was the first co-founder of the airline and is now its chairman and managing director.
As part of the agreement, Maran and Kal Airways had claimed to have paid SpiceJet Rs 679 crore for issuing warrants and preference shares. However, Maran approached the Delhi High Court in 2017, alleging SpiceJet had neither issued convertible warrants and preference shares nor returned the money.
(This report has been published as part of the auto-generated syndicate wire feed. No editing has been done in the headline or the body by ABP Live.)
Top Headlines
