All India Muslim Personal Law Board To File Review Petition Against Supreme Court's Ayodhya Verdict

Maulana Arshad Madani stated on Sunday after a meeting of the board that although they do not have much hope, a review petition will be filed

Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind To File Review Petition Against Supreme Court's Ayodhya Verdict/ Photo Courtesy: ANI

New Delhi: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board will be filing a review petition against the Supreme Court verdict on 'Ram Temple' dispute. After a meeting of the board, Maulana Arshad Madani of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind said, "Despite the fact that we already know that our review petition will be dismissed 100%, we must file a review petition. It is our right." Days after a unanimous verdict by the Supreme Court on the Ayodhya issue, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) met in Lucknow on Sunday to discuss if the board will file a review petition regarding the apex court's verdict on Ayodhya.

Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB): The Board has decided to file a review petition regarding Supreme Court's verdict on Ayodhya case. pic.twitter.com/fV6M2Lifhc

— ANI UP (@ANINewsUP) November 17, 2019

The Supreme Court had last week cleared the way for the construction of a Ram temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya and directed the Centre to allot a five-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a mosque. Speaking to ANI, Maulana Sufian said, "Some of the groups have welcomed the Supreme Court's verdict. But we AIMPLB will hold a meeting at 10 am today to decide whether to review for the petition or not." The Supreme Court on Saturday directed the Central government to hand over the disputed site at Ayodhya for the construction of a temple and set up a trust for the same. The apex court further directed the government to give a suitable plot of land measuring five acres to the Sunni Waqf Board. A five-judge constitution bench presided by Chief Justice Gogoi and comprising Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer passed the order on a batch of petitions against an order of the Allahabad High Court which trifurcated the site between the parties -- Ramlalla Virajman, Sunni Central Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara. A decade-long legal dispute was fought by right-wing party Hindu Mahasabha, a sect of Hindu monks Nirmohi Akhara and Sunni Waqf Board over 2.77 acres of land in Ayodhya.