Explorer
Advertisement
SC says 'mobocracy' cannot be allowed, consider making law against mob-lynching
The Supreme Court will pronounce its verdict on Tuesday on pleas seeking directions to formulate guidelines to curb vigilantism.
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, while reserving their order, had reminded the Central and state governments of their responsibility to curb violence by vigilante groups.
It had said that it was the obligation of the state that crimes involving vigilante groups are prevented, and self-appointed vigilantes can't be allowed to take law in their hands.
The court had earlier said that violence by any vigilante group had to be curbed after its attention was drawn to the violence in Maharashtra in which five people were killed in mob violence in the wake of social media posts on alleged child lifters.
Article 256 of the Constitution, which spells the obligation of States and the Union, provides that the Centre could give necessary directions to the States in a given situation, but the Centre had said it could issue advisories to the states as law and order was a state subject.
LIVE UPDATES:
The Court will review the situation on August 20.
SC asks Parliament to make a law to deal with the offence of mob lynching to punish such offenders.
It the responsibility of the state to protect the peace and pluralistic society.
Mobocracy cannot be allowed.
The hearing begins at Supreme court.
The court's order came on a batch of petitions including one by social activist Tehseen S. Poonawalla and Tushar Gandhi, great grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, seeking to curb violence by cow vigilante groups. The apex court order was not just relating to cow vigilantes but was also on all violence by vigilante groups.
A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, while reserving their order, had reminded the Central and state governments of their responsibility to curb violence by vigilante groups.
It had said that it was the obligation of the state that crimes involving vigilante groups are prevented, and self-appointed vigilantes can't be allowed to take law in their hands.
The court had earlier said that violence by any vigilante group had to be curbed after its attention was drawn to the violence in Maharashtra in which five people were killed in mob violence in the wake of social media posts on alleged child lifters.
Article 256 of the Constitution, which spells the obligation of States and the Union, provides that the Centre could give necessary directions to the States in a given situation, but the Centre had said it could issue advisories to the states as law and order was a state subject.
LIVE UPDATES:
The Court will review the situation on August 20.
SC asks Parliament to make a law to deal with the offence of mob lynching to punish such offenders.
It the responsibility of the state to protect the peace and pluralistic society.
Mobocracy cannot be allowed.
The hearing begins at Supreme court.
The court's order came on a batch of petitions including one by social activist Tehseen S. Poonawalla and Tushar Gandhi, great grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, seeking to curb violence by cow vigilante groups. The apex court order was not just relating to cow vigilantes but was also on all violence by vigilante groups.
India
Almora Bus Accident: Bus Carrying 42 Plunges Into Ravine in Uttarakhand | ABP News
Breaking News: Poster Wars Heat Up in Lucknow Ahead of UP By-Elections | ABP News
Manoj Jarange Makes Bold Declaration Ahead of Maharashtra Elections 2024
UP News: Political Resolution Looms for UP's 69,000 Teacher Recruitment Saga Ahead of By-Elections
Khalistani Assault on Hindu Temple, Deepak Wohra's Fiery Response to Trudeau | ABP News
View More
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Top Headlines
Entertainment
Cities
Celebrities
India
Advertisement