Explorer
Advertisement
After 40 days of hearing, SC reserves verdict in 70-year-old Ayodhya land dispute case
The Muslim side, on the last day of hearing in the Ayodhya title dispute on Wednesday, refuted the Hindu side's claim that the observation of a District Judge in 1886 was in their favour.
Senior counsel Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for Muslim side, contended before the five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, that counsel of the Hindu side wrongly relied on the decision of the District Judge on March 18, 1886, to indicate the title was not denied by the judge by "making an observation it was too late to go into the issue".
Senior counsel Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for Muslim side, contended before the five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, that counsel of the Hindu side wrongly relied on the decision of the District Judge on March 18, 1886, to indicate the title was not denied by the judge by "making an observation it was too late to go into the issue".
India
PM Modi's Birthday Gifts Auctioned For Millions: Discover The Full Details Of The Record-Breaking Sale | Paisa Live
Who Is Delhi's New CM Atishi And How Did She Amass Her Wealth | Paisa Live
This City Tops In Tax Evasion, GST Intelligence Uncovers Record-Breaking Amount | Paisa Live
PM Modi Unveils Ambitious 1000-Year Roadmap To Revolutionize Green Energy And Secure India's Sustainable Future | Paisa Live
Breaking News: School Teacher Commits Atrocity Against 3-Year-Old Girl In Bhopal, MP | ABP News
View More
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Top Headlines
Business
Election 2024
Election 2024
Cities
Advertisement
Trending News
Nayanima Basu
Opinion