Explorer

Supreme Court Sets Aside Its 2018 Verdict On SC/ST Act

A bench of justices Arun Mishra, M R Shah and B R Gavai said the struggle of SC/ST people for equality is still not over in the country. The bench said SC/ST people still face untouchability, abuse and are being socially outcast.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday recalled its direction in the March 20, 2018 verdict which had virtually diluted provisions of arrest under the SC/ST Act. A bench of justices Arun Mishra, M R Shah and B R Gavai said the struggle of SC/ST people for equality is still not over in the country. The bench said SC/ST people still face untouchability, abuse and are being socially outcast. The apex court further said the Constitution provides for protection of SC/ST people under Article 15 but they still face social abuse and discrimination. Dealing with the misuse of provisions of SC/ST Act and lodging of false cases, the bench said it is not due to the caste system but due to human failure. The apex court had in January this year refused to stay the 2018 amendments to the SC/ST Act, which restored the provision that no anticipatory bail be granted to the accused in offence lodged under this law Parliament on August 9 last year had passed the bill to overturn the apex court judgement concerning certain safeguards against arrest under the SC/ST law. In its 2018 verdict, the apex court had taken note of the rampant misuse of the stringent SC/ST Act against government servants and private individuals and said that there would be no immediate arrest on any complaint filed under the law. Violent protests had taken place across the country after the apex court's verdict in which several persons lost their lives and many were injured. The pleas filed in the top court have sought to declare the 2018 amendments to the Act as ultra vires. The pleas have claimed that Parliament had "arbitrarily" decided to amend the law and restored the previous provisions in such a manner so that an innocent cannot avail the right of anticipatory bail. The 2018 amendments rule out any provision for anticipatory bail for a person accused of atrocities against SC/STs, notwithstanding any court order. They provide that no preliminary inquiry would be required for registering a criminal case and an arrest under this law would not be subject to any approval.
View More
Advertisement
Advertisement
25°C
New Delhi
Rain: 100mm
Humidity: 97%
Wind: WNW 47km/h
See Today's Weather
powered by
Accu Weather
Advertisement

Top Headlines

Manipur: Internet Services Suspended Across 7 Districts, Curfew In Imphal West As State On Boil Again
Manipur: Internet Services Suspended Across 7 Districts, Curfew In Imphal West As State On Boil Again
ABP EXCLUSIVE: Can Uddhav Rejoin BJP Alliance? Fadnavis Opens Up On Ties With Ajit Pawar, Mahayuti CM Face & More
ABP EXCLUSIVE: Can Uddhav Rejoin BJP Alliance? Fadnavis Opens Up On Ties With Ajit, Mahayuti’s CM Face & More
ECI Seeks BJP, Congress Responses Over Complaints Against Remarks By PM Modi, Amit Shah, Rahul Gandhi
ECI Seeks BJP, Congress Responses Over Complaints Against Remarks By PM Modi, Amit Shah, Rahul
'Modi Has Lost His Memory': Rahul Gandhi's 'Joe Biden' Jibe At PM In Maharashtra's Amravati — WATCH
'Modi Has Lost His Memory': Rahul Gandhi's 'Joe Biden' Jibe At PM In Maharashtra — WATCH
Advertisement
ABP Premium

Videos

Jhansi Medical College Fire: Akhilesh Yadav Slams Yogi Govt, Demands Action as Tragic Fire Claims Lives of 10 NewbornsMaharashtra Elections 2024: Amit Shah Slams LoP Rahul Gandhi Ahead Of Polls | ABP NewsCM Yogi Announces Rs 5 Lakh Compensation for Jhansi Tragedy Victims' Families, Rs 50,000 for the InjuredDelhi Crime: Gunfire Erupts Again in Delhi, Criminals Open Fire in Gokulpuri Area

Photo Gallery

Embed widget