Fact Check: Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s Shimla Bungalow Is Viral Again With Misleading Claims

Fact Check: Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's house in Shimla was claimed as illegal on social media. Fact-check reveals the land was purchased legally, although there were concerns over relaxation of rules.

Screenshot of X post claiming Fact Check Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's Himachal bungalow was illegal.

Claim:

---

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s house in Chharabra, Himachal Pradesh, is illegal.

 

Fact:

---

Claim was found to be misleading.

 

Fact Check: Purported images of Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s bungalow in Himachal Pradesh's Chharabra have resurfaced on social media amid the ongoing Lok Sabha elections, as allegations fly thick and fast over the Congress manifesto with the BJP claiming the grand old party will seize and redistribute the wealth of Indians if they come to power.

 

The viral claims insinuate that the bungalow is illegal, while mocking her, stating that it should come under the Congress’s “wealth redistribution” plan. The archived version of the tweet can be seen here.  

Newschecker had already debunked the recent claim on September 14, 2020, learning that the land purchased by Priyanka Gandhi Vadra in Himachal is not illegal, although the way in which certain rules were relaxed, including allowing her to purchase in a short time-period was questionable. Also, Newschecker had found no mention of the word “redistribution” in the Congress manifesto.

Result: Partly False

Newschecker Fact Check/ Verification In September 2020 

Note this isn’t the first time Gandhi’s house in Himachal Pradesh has become a topic of dispute. This house has caught the attention of the media and public before as well, and the reason remains that according to the law, no outsider or non-agriculturists can buy land in Himachal Pradesh.

However, a 2007 Tribune India article reads, Priyanka Gandhi “formally became the owner of four bighas and five biswas of land in Charabra on the outskirts of the town after the registry was done in her name on a payment of Rs 46.79 lakh.”

With regard to the validity of the land and house, Section 118 of the H.P. Tenancy & Land Reforms Act, 1972 allows people from outside of Himachal to buy land in the state to build a house. In Gandhi’s case well, the then government sold her the land under this law. 

Under the H.P. Tenancy & Land Reforms Act, 1972, there are provisions that must be complied with before the government can sell the land as well as certain exceptions to these provisions. You can read all the details of the Act here. 

As reported by The Hindu in 2013, “There were 52 educational societies and three private universities among the 881 entities who were permitted to buy land over the period. Several hydropower companies, corporate house, industrial units and religious bodies were also among those for whom permissions under Section 118 of the HP Land Tenancy and Reforms Act 1972 were allowed,” said the then Revenue Minister Kaul Singh Thakur during a question hour. 

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan are among the “881 individual beneficiaries, companies, societies and trusts granted permission in the last three years to buy land in Himachal Pradesh,” states the article.  

A 2013 Indian Express article details how BJP’s Prem Kumar Dhumal led government granted permissions to purchase land in the state between 2010-2012. A majority of whom are outsiders and non-agriculturist Himachalis. 

“Priyanka tops the list. She was granted permission in 2011 to purchase 922 sqm of land in addition to the three-and-a-half bigha that she had bought during the 2006-2007 BJP for construction of a cottage in high security zone of Charrabra, close to President’s Summer Retreat,13 km from Shimla. The BJP government allowed her to buy the additional land near the plot she already owned.”

Petition Filed By Activist 

An Indian Express report explains a petition filed by RTI activist Dev Ashish Bhattacharya. His petition seeked details on Gandhi’s property and permission granted by the state government under section 118 of HP Tenancy and Land Reforms Act. 

In The Wire article titled, “As Details of Priyanka Gandhi’s Land Deal Surface, RTI Petitioner Alleges Foul Play,” Bhattacharya’s suspected flaws in the land deal are detailed.  The article also includes a response to his RTI by the DG of Shimla. 

As per The Wire’s article, Bhattacharya found four major flaws in the land deal:

1. Three land deals in the state are not permissible, so how did Gandhi purchase it?
2. Purchase of land only allowed with permission of board. But no board was formed in this purchase.
3. Construction not completed in two years  
4. No notice was sent to Gandhi despite the above point 

Newschecker spoke with senior advocate Vishwa Mohan Sharma of Himachal Pradesh High Court in order to understand the law pertaining to the above questions. In response to the first two questions, he said there is no such provision in this law. 

With regard to the construction, Sharma said according to the law, the purchased land has to be “put to use” within two years of purchase. The law does not state that construction has to be completed within two years. 

However, Sharma explained that there are a few doubtful points with regard to Gandhi’s land purchase in Himachal. One such point is allowing Gandhi, an outsider in Himachal to purchase land within a short time frame. These questions can only be asked from a moral ground as no rules have been violated from a legal standpoint in this purchase, he adds. 

Conclusion 

Our research makes it clear that land purchased by Priyanka Gandhi Vadra in Himachal is not illegal. Though the way in which certain rules were relaxed including allowing her to purchase in a short time-period can be questioned. Therefore, the claim on Gandhi’s Himachal home being illegal is misleading. 

Result: Misleading 

This story was originally published by Newschecker.in, as part of the Shakti Collective. Except for the headline, excerpt, and the opening introduction para, this story has not been edited by ABPLIVE staff. This report includes a previous fact-check by Newschecker on the same topic to add depth and context.