Opinion | US Presidents In India: From Eisenhower To Trump

India would love to get preferential access to US markets for things like garments exports, but that is not going to happen. In fact in recent weeks America has removed India from the list of nations that get some differential treatment. Our desire to be seen as a global power, which we are not, has certain consequences.

Photo: AFP/Getty Images

America’s president will be in Ahmedabad, Agra and Delhi on Monday and Tuesday. He is not particularly keen to travel, and this appears to be common to most Americans. At the age of 16, I spent a year in an American village. One afternoon, there was a desk in the school that offered an exchange programme under which Americans could travel for a period abroad just as I had. If I remember it right, nobody signed up. Donald Trump since becoming president has visited 20 countries of which the majority are in Europe. He has been to France four times. He dislikes the developing world and doesn’t want immigrants from what he calls ‘shit-hole country’, in which list he presumably includes India. He has been to Afghanistan but only to an American military base there. India will be the first poor nation that he has visited as president and probably the first poor nation he will ever see. It will be interesting to see what his observations are, especially because he is not shy to say impolite things. Trump will be by my count the sixth president to formally visit India. The first was Dwight D Eisenhower, a famous World War general who became president and invented the phrase “military industrial complex”. The BBC reported that "nearly every US president on a state visit to India has emulated his itinerary: he laid flowers at Mahatma Gandhi's memorial, took in the splendour of the Taj Mahal, addressed parliament and spoke at Delhi's iconic Ramlila grounds, which, according to one news report, attracted 10 lakh people.” An equally warm visit was the one by president Clinton, who came 20 years ago. I remember that visit well, and it was amazing to see the scenes inside Parliament, where he spoke. One MP, I think it was Ramdas Athavale, currently a minister in the Modi Cabinet, was leaping over the tables to run to Clinton and meet him after the speech was over. Clinton had some harsh words for India at the time, related to our nuclear adventurism and tensions with Pakistan. But overall, despite the fact that it was also a Hindutva government (under Vajpayee) and Clinton was a liberal, the visit went off well. Clinton also briefly visited Pakistan as was the custom at the time, so that they would not feel bad. The reverse happened in terms of ideology when George W Bush, from a conservative party, visited when liberal Manmohan Singh was prime minister. That was also a warm visit but because Bush did not have the charisma of Clinton (very few leaders did and do), it was not as spectacular though in terms of results it was seen by analysts as good for India, producing the nuclear deal. Barack Obama has come to India twice, once when Manmohan was PM and then of course when he was served tea by Modi wearing that suit with his name embroidered on it. Obama is a very middle class man and wears shoes that are frequently resoled. I wonder what he thought of Modi and Indians when the Indian prime minister appeared before him wearing that suit. Obama is an intellectual and called Manmohan his guru. Trump and Modi are similar in that sense. Both are men of the people who like addressing rallies, are active on social media, are egotistical (Modi refers to himself in the third person frequently, while Trump can honestly be described as a proper egomaniac). Both have been aggressively anti-immigrant. Trump had a ban on Muslims travelling to the US from certain nations and Modi has excluded from from his Citizenship Amendment Act. Unlike the Clinton visit and the Bush visit, there is no specific reason for Trump to come. He is not even here for Republic Day which is the classic invitation ruse. He will speak at a rally with Modi in Ahmedabad, visit the Taj and then fly off. There is no trade deal that will be signed. Trump wants India to open up its market to American farmers, which will be difficult for Modi to do. And Modi has made India progressively more protectionist with import duties which makes American goods coming in through a trade deal more complicated. India would love to get preferential access to US markets for things like garments exports, but that is not going to happen. In fact in recent weeks America has removed India from the list of nations that get some differential treatment. Our desire to be seen as a global power, which we are not, has certain consequences. Indian companies in Bangalore want a more relaxed visa regime, but that is also not going to be possible given Trump’s anti-immigration and especially anti-brown and black skin values. So what will be the end result of the Trump visit? It will be entertainment for many (though of course not those who have been evicted from their homes in Ahmedabad) but it will not be historically significant. Trump has no real affection for India or indeed any knowledge of it. The last thing is that Trump may or may not be president at this time next year. The US elections are in November, and it is possible that we may have a Democrat in the White House. If that is the case, then not only will we have to write off all the personalised investment in the Trump-Modi chemistry. A Democrat in the White House will mean greater scrutiny of our actions in Kashmir and over the CAA and National Register controversy. The best thing that Modi can hope for in this visit is that he is able to mobilise Indians in America to vote Republican and try and help Trump return to power. (Aakar Patel is a columnist and writer) Disclaimer: The opinions, beliefs and views expressed by the various authors and forum participants on this website are personal and do not reflect the opinions, beliefs and views of ABP News Network Pvt Ltd.