The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) retracted its September 4 press release on Monday, which had addressed allegations of a "toxic" work culture within the organisation. The regulator dismissed these concerns as "misplaced" and affirmed that employee-related issues will be handled internally.
The decision to retract the statement follows significant unrest among SEBI staff, who staged a protest outside the regulator's headquarters on September 5, demanding the press release's withdrawal and the resignation of SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch.
In a statement issued on Monday, SEBI recognised the vital contributions of its employees over the past 36 years in enhancing the Indian securities market's global reputation for dynamism and regulation. The regulator reiterated its commitment to resolving employee issues through established internal mechanisms.
"Following constructive discussions with representatives from all grades of officers, SEBI and its employees have reaffirmed that such issues are strictly internal and will be managed according to the organisation's high standards of governance and within a time-bound framework," SEBI stated.
The retraction comes after strong condemnation from employees regarding the unauthorised dissemination of internal communications. SEBI employees have reiterated their commitment to addressing concerns through appropriate internal channels.
The controversy has surfaced at a challenging time for Puri, as she faces speculation about a potential conflict of interest related to Adani Group probe and other related allegations.
On August 6, nearly 500 SEBI employees sent a letter to the Finance Ministry, criticising the top management for creating a "toxic" work environment marked by public humiliation and intimidation. In response, SEBI issued a press release dismissing the claims, which further fueled employee dissatisfaction.
SEBI's initial response to the situation included an assertion that some "external elements" had encouraged employees to question high standards of performance and accountability. However, specific details on these external influences were not provided.