The apex court also asserted that it has been satisfied with government’s decision and said that it is wrong to question the number of jets purchased by the government. It said that "Questions raised on Rafale deal only after ex-French prez Hollande came out with statement, which can't be basis of judicial review".
“There is no occasion to doubt decision-making process in Rafale deal” court said. It further said that it cannot compel government to procure 126 or 36 fighter jets which depends upon its decision.
This comes after a bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi had reserved its verdict on a batch of pleas on November 14.
Advocate M L Sharma was the first petitioner in the case. Later, another lawyer Vineet Dhanda had moved the apex court with the plea for court-monitored probe into the deal. AAP leader Sanjay Singh has also filed a petition against the fighter jet deal.
After the three petitions were filed, former Union ministers Yashwant Sinha and Arun Shourie alongwith activist advocate Prashant Bhushan had moved the apex court with a plea for a direction to the CBI to register FIR for alleged irregularities in the deal.
The Centre has defended the deal for 36 Rafale fighter jets and opposed public disclosure of the pricing details.
India signed an agreement with France for the purchase of 36 Rafale fighter aircraft in a fly-away condition as part of the upgrading process of Indian Air Force equipment. The deal is estimated to be about Rs 58,000 crore (about USD 8 billion).