Conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar, currently incarcerated in Delhi's Mandoli prison in connection with a Rs 200-crore money laundering case, has released another sensational letter. In the letter, addressed to 'Akkaiah' K Kavitha, he welcomed her to the 'Tihar Club' and hinted at having more information regarding Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. Sukesh alleged that Kavitha's arrest would unveil a "Pandora's Box of corruption" and will lead to the exposure of "dearest Arvind Kejriwal" to a new level.
BJP leader Ramesh Naidu Nagothu shared the letter on his official X handle, and stated: "Imagine the level of corruption they've done in the name of Public Service."
“All your corrupt associates, including the king of corruption, my dearest Arvind Kejriwal, are going to be exposed to another level. Thousands of crores that you and your party have looted and stacked in Singapore, Hong Kong and Germany will all be out in the open,” the letter reads.
Sukesh further stated that individuals who dismiss allegations against them as fake and politically motivated are facing the consequences of their actions. He asserted his intention to soon reveal more details about CM Arvind Kejriwal as well. “The truth has prevailed, the dramas of saying fake cases, fake allegations, the political witch hunt have fallen flat, all your karmas are coming back to you,” the letter stated.
The incarcerated conman further claimed that two predictions he made last year have come to reality. Firstly, he predicted that the "BRS would be ousted from power in Telangana" following the 2023 Assembly elections. Secondly, he foretold that Kavitha would be arrested and become a member of the Tihar Club, both of which have now become reality.
The letter came after the Enforcement Directorate's arrest of BRS leader and former Telangana Chief Minister KCR’s daughter, K Kavitha. The arrest followed an extensive raid at her residences in Hyderabad. Subsequently, she was brought to Delhi for questionning in connection with a money laundering case associated with the Delhi excise policy case.