An FIR was registered against popular TV actress Shweta Tiwari by her estranged husband Abhinav Kohli a few months back. The FIR stated that she had fled the country in violation of the proceedings pending before the court, when the actress had gone to Cape Town for the shooting of her reality show Khatron Ke Khiladi 11.
Her estranged husband had accused her that she has abandoned their son and left. Following which Shweta had also shared a video in which Abhinav was seen manhandling her & their little son Reyansh. The now deleted video had gone viral on social media within no time and now the latest update in the case is that the TV actress has got relief from court.
While sharing an update on the case, a source close to Shweta Tiwari told a website that, “It is correct that a FIR is filed in the year 2021 for the alleged offence committed in 2017 which pertains to forging of an NOC of Abhinav Kohli permitting their minor son to apply for a visa for travelling to the UK. The source further says that as per Abhinav, his signature on The NOC was forged by Shweta which seems rather odd as in the same year Abhinav has gone ahead and given another NOC for the purpose of securing visa for their son to travel to the same country. The source further added that if Abhinavs signature was forged by Shweta then why would he give the same NOC at a subsequent date for travel to the same country. Furthermore, if the alleged forging was committed in 2017 then why did Abhinav wait until 2021.”
However, the court has granted her anticipatory bail in the same FIR registered in the instance of Abhinav Kohli. Her application was argued by Advocate Hrishikesh Mundargi and Subir Sarkar. “Shweta has always led her life with dignity and chosen not to wash her dirty linen in public unless and until it comes to the safety of her family this time around too she spoke up only when the mud was slung at her daughter and family by and large...it is sad a lady with such reputed work to her credit and a character and personality this strong has to go through what she is because of her marital decisions going wrong,” they argued in court.