Hari Hara Veera Mallu review: After nearly five years in the making, Pawan Kalyan’s long-awaited period action drama 'Hari Hara Veera Mallu' has finally hit the screens. Directed initially by Krish Jagarlamudi and later completed by Jyothi Krishna (son of producer AM Rathnam), this historical action-adventure set in the Mughal era features Nidhhi Agerwal as the female lead and Bobby Deol as the antagonist. Though delays due to the pandemic, elections, and Pawan’s political commitments cast a shadow over the film’s progress, its trailer and the actor’s promotional involvement revived curiosity and sparked last-minute buzz.

Hari Hara Veera Mallu story: A Robin Hood in Mughal India

Set during the 17th century, the film follows Hari Hara Veera Mallu (Pawan Kalyan), a fearless outlaw who robs diamonds from British ships docked at the Machilipatnam port and distributes the loot to the needy. His reputation reaches a local feudal lord (Sachin Khedekar), who assigns him a daring mission: to steal the precious jewels intended as tribute to the Golconda Nawab.

Along the way, Veera Mallu falls in love with Panchami (Nidhhi Agerwal), a dancer enslaved by the noble. She implores him to help her escape. However, during his heist, Veera Mallu is captured by Golconda soldiers. Rather than face execution, he is sent on an even deadlier mission—to Delhi, to retrieve the Kohinoor diamond from Mughal emperor Aurangzeb.

The film unfolds as Veera Mallu journeys across kingdoms, clashing with emperors, battling oppressive regimes, and confronting the tyranny of Aurangzeb’s jizya tax on Hindus. The rest of the film explores whether he reunites with Panchami, completes his mission, and how his path ties into the broader cause of defending Sanatana Dharma.

How is Hari Hara Veera Mallu?

While fans have been more eagerly waiting for Pawan Kalyan’s "OG", this film managed to spring a surprise. With low expectations and limited initial buzz, "Hari Hara Veera Mallu" works to its advantage—especially in the first half.

The opening portions are impressively mounted. From Pawan’s heroic entry to the action set-piece near Charminar before the interval, the film delivers cinematic highs. The grandeur is evident, and certain sequences feel genuinely arresting. Visually, the film feels epic, thanks to some strong production design and scale.

But the film isn’t without flaws. In fact, they become more evident in the second half. Scenes shot in Amaravati sets—meant to accommodate Pawan’s political schedule—lack visual finesse, with sub-par VFX that break the immersion. While the Sanatana Dharma episode injects energy back into the narrative, the film loses momentum soon after.

The climax feels rushed and underwhelming, almost as if setting up a sequel. The story arc involving both the Kohinoor mission and the cultural-religious resistance ends abruptly. It’s clear that the narrative was split in two, but the lack of closure makes this installment feel incomplete.

Performances: Pawan's charisma holds the fort

Pawan Kalyan is in fine form. His portrayal of Veera Mallu is intense and sincere, and it's arguably his most physically and emotionally invested performance since entering politics. He completely disappears into the role, lending gravitas to a folk-hero figure. His scenes with the tiger and wolf are crowd-pleasers and showcase his mass appeal.

Nidhhi Agerwal gets significant screen time in the first half, with a romantic subplot and a glamorous appearance in the song "Tara Tara." Post-interval, her presence is limited to a few scenes and a song.

Bobby Deol, as Aurangzeb, is a revelation. His cold, calculated villainy adds menace, and his performance is one of the film’s highlights. Satya Raj, Sunil, Nasser, and Subbaraju appear in crucial roles but are largely underutilized. The comic attempts by Sunil and others fail to land.

The film is peppered with cameos by Anasuya, Pujita Ponnada, and Anudeep in musical sequences, but they offer little beyond visual flair.

Technical aspects: Style over consistency

The film had multiple cinematographers (Gnanashekar VS and Manoj Paramahamsa), which may explain its inconsistent visual tone. The transitions between scenes shot by different teams are noticeable. Lip-sync issues in the dubbed version are glaring and could’ve been avoided with better attention to detail.

MM Keeravani's background score is a major asset. His rousing compositions elevate key emotional and action-heavy sequences, especially the Sanatana Dharma portions. His work here is crucial to the film’s mood and tone. The songs, particularly the fight choreography and Veera Mallu’s introduction, also land well on screen.

Verdict: Visually grand, emotionally scattered

Hari Hara Veera Mallu is an ambitious period film that benefits greatly from Pawan Kalyan’s screen presence, Keeravani’s music, and the film’s historical canvas. But its uneven screenplay, VFX shortcomings, and abrupt ending leave much to be desired.

If you walk in with moderate expectations, there’s enough here to enjoy—especially in the first half. But the second half might leave you wanting more. Hopefully, the sequel (which the film hints at) brings the full vision to life with tighter writing and stronger execution.