Related Quiz
What specific concern did Raj Thackeray raise about the ink used on voters' fingers?
He alleged the ink could be easily removed, potentially allowing for repeat voting.
He was concerned the ink was too visible and would make it easier to identify voters.
He alleged the ink could be easily removed, potentially allowing for repeat voting.
He stated the ink was causing allergic reactions among voters.
He believed the ink was a sign of development and progress.
What action did Raj Thackeray urge Shiv Sena and MNS workers to take?
To remain alert and monitor for duplicate voters at polling booths.
To campaign aggressively for their candidates in the final hours of the election.
To distribute money to voters in exchange for their votes.
To remain alert and monitor for duplicate voters at polling booths.
To protest outside the Election Commission's office.
Advertisement
According to Raj Thackeray, what was the primary goal of the ruling party?
To win the election 'by hook or by crook'.
To improve the infrastructure and development of the state.
To ensure transparency in the election process.
To win the election 'by hook or by crook'.
To promote healthy democratic practices.
What did Raj Thackeray say about the Election Commission's handling of the new counting device?
He alleged that the Election Commission had not demonstrated the device to any political party and provided little information about it.
He stated that the Election Commission demonstrated the device to all political parties before the election.
He claimed the Election Commission was very transparent in explaining the device's functionality.
He alleged that the Election Commission had not demonstrated the device to any political party and provided little information about it.
He praised the Election Commission for its thorough and clear explanation of the device's workings.
What specific incident did Raj Thackeray mention that occurred at a polling booth in Dadar?
The discovery of a duplicate voter.
A protest against the use of VVPAT machines.
The discovery of a duplicate voter.
The distribution of money by opposition party candidates.
A malfunction of the new counting device.
Your Score
2/10
Share
2/10