Related Quiz

What was the primary concern of the Trinamool Congress (TMC) regarding the ED raid?
The ED was targeting specific TMC members with no legal basis.
The ED might use seized data for political purposes and violate their privacy.
The ED's actions were directly aimed at influencing the upcoming elections.
The ED was not authorized to conduct a raid on the I-PAC office.
According to the ED, who took possession of the documents in question?
The investigating agency kept the documents for further analysis.
The documents were taken by a stranger not associated with the case.
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee took possession of the records.
The I-PAC employees took the documents during the raid.
Advertisement
What was the Calcutta High Court's decision regarding the TMC's petition?
The court sided with the ED and dismissed the TMC's petition.
The court decided to defer the hearing until the Supreme Court made a ruling.
The court held that the petition had become meaningless and disposed of it.
The court ordered the ED to immediately return all seized documents to the TMC.
What was the ED's primary argument in response to the TMC's concerns?
The TMC had no right to privacy in this matter and could not bring a suit.
The TMC was not a party in the Supreme Court case and the ED has no intention of targeting the TMC.
The ED was unaware of any raid on the I-PAC office and that they have not seized any documents.
The TMC's petition was filed without proper legal grounds.
What did the ED's counsel request of the High Court?
To immediately dismiss the TMC's petition due to lack of merit.
To take up the case and issue a ruling on the validity of the raid.
To defer the hearing because a related petition was pending before the Supreme Court.
To issue a warrant for the arrest of Mamata Banerjee.
Your Score
2/10